company-name-logo

Nashik

Latest Judgments

Total 538 Consumer Court Cases Against Nashik.

Maharashtra

Lief insurance corparshan Jivan prakash R g gadkari chuk Nashik V/S vilas Kashinatha Joshi 80 Ft Road Dhule

Nashik   Insurance  

Court Name: Dhule

Appelant Advocate M G Devale

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DHULEComplaint Case No. CC/11/1451. vilas Kashinatha Joshi 80 Ft Road Dhule...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Lief insurance corparshan Jivan prakash R g gadkari chuk Nashik............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. D. D. Madake PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MRS. S. ...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 01-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

SMT DAYAGAURI KALYANJI BADIANI V/S THE LIQUIDATOR, SHRIRAM SAH KARI BANK LTD NASHIK

Nashik  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate NITIN R BHAVAR

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/12/163(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/08/2007 in Case No. 68/2005 of District Nashik)1. THE LIQUIDATOR, SHRIRAM SAH KARI BANK LTD NASHIKHEAD OFFICE AT MARKET YARD SHOPPING CENTER ...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 24-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

SHABBIR AHMED KHATIB V/S THE LIQUIDATOR, SHRIRAM SAH KARI BANK LTD NASHIK

Nashik  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate NITIN R BHAVAR

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/12/164(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/09/2011 in Case No. 146/2011 of District Nashik)1. THE LIQUIDATOR, SHRIRAM SAH KARI BANK LTD NASHIKHEAD OFFICE AT MARKET YARD SHOPPING CENTER...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 24-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

THE NASHIK DIST CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD V/S SHRI SADASHIV PUNDALIK RIKAME

Nashik  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate MR SANJAY SHINDE

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/11/2811. SHRI SADASHIV PUNDALIK RIKAME R/O VINCHURI GAVALI POST MADSANGAVI TAL NASHIKNASHIKMAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. THE NASHIK DIST CENTRAL CO-O...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 23-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Principal, Nashik Cambridge CBSC School V/S Shri Narendra Narsibhai Chouhan

School   Nashik  

Court Name: Nashik

Appelant Advocate Shri Dipak Wagh

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/208/20111. Shri Narendra Narsibhai ChouhanR/o Through Namrata Sweet, Shahu maharaj path, Rajendra Colony, Nashik Rd.,NashikNashikMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Principal, Nashik Cambridge CBSC School Wadala Pathrdi Rd.Opp Sent Jorj Charch,Indir...

Case Number: 208

|

Date of Filing: 09-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, NASHIK DIVISION OFFICE, V/S SANYOGITA P. CHAVAN,

Life Insurance Corporation   Life Insurance Corporation   Life Insurance   Life Insurance   Nashik   Insurance  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate --

Respondant Advocate --

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/05/15291. SANYOGITA P. CHAVAN,R/O 208, SONA SHOPPING CENTRE, TILAK PATH, GAJMAL, NASHIK............Appellant(s)Versus1. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, NASHIK...

Case Number: 5

|

Date of Filing: 06-07-2005

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Shri. Uttamrao Bhimrao Pagare V/S The Nashik Merchants Co. Op. Bank Ltd., Satpur Branch

Nashik  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Tejesh Dande

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/06/1764(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/08/2006 in Case No. 89/2004 of District Nashik)1. The Nashik Merchants Co. Op. Bank Ltd., Satpur BranchThrough its Manager, Near ITI, Satpur...

Case Number: 6

|

Date of Filing: 07-09-2006

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

The Nashik Peoples Co. Op. Bank Ltd. V/S Shri. Ashok Jaikishan Sharma

Nashik  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Smita Gaidhani / P. P. Shinde / Sou. Vijaya P. Maheshwari

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/06/1618(Arisen out of Order Dated 14/07/2006 in Case No. 37/2006 of District Nashik)1. Shri. Ashok Jaikishan SharmaRes. at 4615, Himalaya House, Jajuwadi, Panchavati, NashikNash...

Case Number: 6

|

Date of Filing: 16-08-2006

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

manager kabal ganeral Insuranse Servisces Pvt Ltd 4A Dehmandir co op gangapur road nashik V/S S m Shetal Madan Savale (patil )At post Chhawade Ta Sakri Dist Dhule

Nashik  

Court Name: Dhule

Appelant Advocate D V gharte

Respondant Advocate K.P.Sabadra

Complaint Case No. CC/11/141. S m Shetal Madan Savale (patil )At post Chhawade Ta Sakri Dist Dhule...........Complainant(s)Versus1. manager kabal ganeral Insuranse Servisces Pvt Ltd 4A Dehmandir co op gangapur road nashik............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONABLE MR. D. D. Madake PR...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 21-01-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

BAJAJ ALIANCE GENARAL ISSURANCE CO LTD NASHIK V/S AKBAR KHAN AMIT KHAN PATHAN NER DHULE

Nashik   Bajaj  

Court Name: Dhule

Appelant Advocate M B JAIN

Respondant Advocate D.N. Pingale

Complaint Case No. CC/10/2621. AKBAR KHAN AMIT KHAN PATHAN NER DHULEAt post ner Dhuledhulemaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. BAJAJ ALIANCE GENARAL ISSURANCE CO LTD NASHIKganesha Plaza Kute Marga Mumbai Naka NashikNashikmaharashtra............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONABLE ...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 01-09-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Nashik in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Nashik ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Nashik under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.