Court Name: Dhule
Appelant Advocate M G Devale
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DHULEComplaint Case No. CC/11/1451. vilas Kashinatha Joshi 80 Ft Road Dhule...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Lief insurance corparshan Jivan prakash R g gadkari chuk Nashik............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. D. D. Madake PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MRS. S. ...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NITIN R BHAVAR
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/12/163(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/08/2007 in Case No. 68/2005 of District Nashik)1. THE LIQUIDATOR, SHRIRAM SAH KARI BANK LTD NASHIKHEAD OFFICE AT MARKET YARD SHOPPING CENTER ...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NITIN R BHAVAR
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/12/164(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/09/2011 in Case No. 146/2011 of District Nashik)1. THE LIQUIDATOR, SHRIRAM SAH KARI BANK LTD NASHIKHEAD OFFICE AT MARKET YARD SHOPPING CENTER...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MR SANJAY SHINDE
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/11/2811. SHRI SADASHIV PUNDALIK RIKAME R/O VINCHURI GAVALI POST MADSANGAVI TAL NASHIKNASHIKMAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. THE NASHIK DIST CENTRAL CO-O...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 23-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Nashik
Appelant Advocate Shri Dipak Wagh
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/208/20111. Shri Narendra Narsibhai ChouhanR/o Through Namrata Sweet, Shahu maharaj path, Rajendra Colony, Nashik Rd.,NashikNashikMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Principal, Nashik Cambridge CBSC School Wadala Pathrdi Rd.Opp Sent Jorj Charch,Indir...
Case Number: 208
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Life Insurance Corporation Life Insurance Corporation Life Insurance Life Insurance Nashik Insurance
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate --
Respondant Advocate --
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/05/15291. SANYOGITA P. CHAVAN,R/O 208, SONA SHOPPING CENTRE, TILAK PATH, GAJMAL, NASHIK............Appellant(s)Versus1. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, NASHIK...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Tejesh Dande
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/06/1764(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/08/2006 in Case No. 89/2004 of District Nashik)1. The Nashik Merchants Co. Op. Bank Ltd., Satpur BranchThrough its Manager, Near ITI, Satpur...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Smita Gaidhani / P. P. Shinde / Sou. Vijaya P. Maheshwari
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/06/1618(Arisen out of Order Dated 14/07/2006 in Case No. 37/2006 of District Nashik)1. Shri. Ashok Jaikishan SharmaRes. at 4615, Himalaya House, Jajuwadi, Panchavati, NashikNash...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Dhule
Appelant Advocate D V gharte
Respondant Advocate K.P.Sabadra
Complaint Case No. CC/11/141. S m Shetal Madan Savale (patil )At post Chhawade Ta Sakri Dist Dhule...........Complainant(s)Versus1. manager kabal ganeral Insuranse Servisces Pvt Ltd 4A Dehmandir co op gangapur road nashik............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONABLE MR. D. D. Madake PR...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 21-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Dhule
Appelant Advocate M B JAIN
Respondant Advocate D.N. Pingale
Complaint Case No. CC/10/2621. AKBAR KHAN AMIT KHAN PATHAN NER DHULEAt post ner Dhuledhulemaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. BAJAJ ALIANCE GENARAL ISSURANCE CO LTD NASHIKganesha Plaza Kute Marga Mumbai Naka NashikNashikmaharashtra............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONABLE ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Nashik in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Nashik ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Nashik under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.