company-name-logo

Nashik

Latest Judgments

Total 538 Consumer Court Cases Against Nashik.

Maharashtra

Diviganal Ragistrar Life Insurannce Corporatian India Nashik Tal Dist nashik2Branch manger Lif Insur V/S vandana Nitin Chavan Hause No 602 Old Dhule

Nashik  

Court Name: Dhule

Appelant Advocate D N Male

Respondant Advocate Sanjay Shimpi

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DHULEComplaint Case No. CC/11/1171. vandana Nitin Chavan Hause No 602 Old Dhule...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Diviganal Ragistrar Life Insurannce Corporatian India Nashik Tal Dist nashik2Branch manger Lif Insurance Co India Civil Hospital Shakri Road Dh...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 14-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

krushi udog Bhandar candvad nashik V/S Mhadu piran Patil At post Sonevade Dhule

Nashik  

Court Name: Dhule

Appelant Advocate k R lohar

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DHULEComplaint Case No. CC/11/2551. Mhadu piran Patil At post Sonevade Dhule...........Complainant(s)Versus1. krushi udog Bhandar candvad nashik............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MRS. V.V. Dani PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MRS. S. S. Jain MEMBERHON'ABLE MR. S.S...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 31-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Epko Tokiyo Genral insurance co ltd mumbai juna agra road nashik V/S Bansilal Gavadishnakar Agrawal laxmi colony Dondyacha tal shindkheda

Nashik   Insurance  

Court Name: Dhule

Appelant Advocate n p Ayachit

Respondant Advocate D.Pingale

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DHULEComplaint Case No. CC/12/521. Bansilal Gavadishnakar Agrawal laxmi colony Dondyacha tal shindkhedaRo24 Laxmi Colyne Dondica Taluka Shindkeda Distik DhuleNashikMaharshtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Epko Tokiyo Genral insurance co ltd mumbai juna ...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 03-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Managar Kabal Ganral Insu Servicas Pvt Ltd 4 dehmandirCo Oper Gangapur Road nashik V/S sr matti hashina Mastana Khatik Ranmal Dhule

Nashik  

Court Name: Dhule

Appelant Advocate D V Gharte

Respondant Advocate C.P.Kulkarni

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DHULEComplaint Case No. CC/12/871. sr matti hashina Mastana Khatik Ranmal DhuleAt Post ranmala Tal . Dist. DhuleMaharshtardhule...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Managar Kabal Ganral Insu Servicas Pvt Ltd 4 dehmandirCo Oper Gangapur Road nashik Maharshtardh...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 20-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Branch Manajar Kabal Ganeral Insurance services pravet Ltd Nashik V/S Shrimati Vijaya Ravindra Patil Vathoda tal Shirpur Distri Dhule

Nashik   Insurance  

Court Name: Dhule

Appelant Advocate A R Sisodiya

Respondant Advocate For O.P.No.2 - K.P.Sabadra

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DHULEComplaint Case No. CC/11/411. Shrimati Vijaya Ravindra Patil Vathoda tal Shirpur Distri Dhule...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Branch Manajar Kabal Ganeral Insurance services pravet Ltd Nashik ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MRS. V.V. Dani PR...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 05-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Kabal Insurance Services Pra. Ltd. Nashik V/S Vimalbai Mohan Pardhi

Nashik   Insurance  

Court Name: Jalgaon

Appelant Advocate Adv. Bhangale

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/09/7281. Vimalbai Mohan PardhiMaharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Kabal Insurance Services Pra. Ltd. NashikMaharastra............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MRS. Poonam N.Malik PRESIDING MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERजिल्‍हा ग्राह�...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 20-05-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Divejan Manejar Bharatiya jivan Vima Nigam Jivan Prakash Gadkari Couk Lane Agra Raod Nashik V/S Shri Sunita Durvas patil Railway police Line Ambalner Ta Ambalner Dist Dhule

Railway   Nashik  

Court Name: Dhule

Appelant Advocate R V Nikam

Respondant Advocate Vishal Bhat

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DHULEComplaint Case No. CC/11/451. Shri Sunita Durvas patil Railway police Line Ambalner Ta Ambalner Dist Dhule...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Divejan Manejar Bharatiya jivan Vima Nigam Jivan Prakash Gadkari Couk Lane Agra Raod Nashik............Opp.Part...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 04-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Life Insurance Corporation Of India, Nashik Division Offce V/S Mrs. Sanyogita P. Chavan

Life Insurance Corporation   Life Insurance   Life Insurance   Nashik   Insurance  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ms. Smita Gaidhani

Respondant Advocate Mr.Milind More

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/05/1211(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/03/2005 in Case No. 142/2004 of District Nashik)1. Mrs. Sanyogita P. ChavanR/o. 208, Sona Shopping Centre, Tilak Path, Gajmal, NashikNashikM...

Case Number: 5

|

Date of Filing: 06-07-2005

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

SHRI DIGAMBAR BABURAO THORAT V/S THE CHAIRMAN, BALSAGAR CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD NASHIK

Society   Nashik  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SACHIN PAWAR

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/12/1191. THE CHAIRMAN, BALSAGAR CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD NASHIKSHIVANJALI ENTERPRISES 14 NIDHI PARK 1 ST FLOOR IN FRONT OF HAJI MITHAI VAKILWADI M G ROAD NASHIKNA...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 14-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

SHRI DIGAMBAR BABURAO THORAT V/S THE CHAIRMAN, BALSAGAR CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD NASHIK

Society   Nashik  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate SACHIN PAWAR

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/12/199(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/02/2011 in Case No. 50/2010 of District Nashik)1. THE CHAIRMAN, BALSAGAR CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD NASHIKSHIVANJALI ENTERPRISES 14 NIDHI PARK...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 14-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Nashik in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Nashik ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Nashik under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.