Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vipin Kaushal
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 23-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 14-01-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Tina Shenvi
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 04-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 18-12-2015
Court Name: Varanasi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 195
|
Date of Filing: 04-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 22-09-2015
Court Name: Rayagada
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate Braja Sundar Nayak
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/15/961. Mr. Surya Narayan TripathyOffice of DIGP, CRPF, Raniguda Farm, Near Bethal Shurch,RayagadaOdisha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Naaptol Service Warehouse Naaptol Online Shoping pvt., Ltd.,13Pl, Solutions, OLD No.B-98, New Pandey Med...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 13-08-2015
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 15-07-2015
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-02-2016
Court Name: Vadodara
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 24-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-04-2015
Court Name: Raigarh
Appelant Advocate SMT. Beronika Ekka
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMAR DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMRAIGARH C.G.Complaint Case No. CC/19/20151. SMT. Beronika EkkaRaigarhRaigarhChhattisgarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Naaptol Com.New DelhiDelhiDelhi............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. SANMAN SINGH PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. SUBHAS ...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 10-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SUDHIR KUMAR OJHA & MR. DINESH KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 651-652 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 13/09/2013 in Appeal No. 1380/2012 & 556/2012 of the State Commission Karnataka) WITH IA/280/2014,IA/281/20141. NAAPTOL ONLINE SHOPPING PVT. LTDHAVING ITS REGIS...
Case Number: 651
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2014
Case Number: 289
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 21-06-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Naaptol in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Naaptol ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Naaptol under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.