Mutual Fund
Latest Judgments
Total 172 Consumer Court Cases Against Mutual Fund.
CHAIRMAIN UTI MUTUAL FUND V/S SATISH KUMAR
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 413
|
Date of Filing: 27-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 13-02-2016
Customer Service Executive, ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund V/S Mr. Vishal Kapoor
Court Name: Central Mumbai
Appelant Advocate Chakor Mehta
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CENTRAL MUMBAI DISTRICT.Puravatha Bhavan, 2nd floor, Gen. Nagesh Marg, Nr. Mahatma Gandhi Hospital, Parel, Mumbai-12.Complaint Case No. CC/12/1461. Mr. Vishal Kapoor801, Sunfloor Regency Gardens, Sec-6, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai 410210...........Com...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 518
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2016
The Manager, UTI Mutual Fund V/S P.P.Shree Vasudevanand Sarswati Maharaj and P.P. Lokanathteerth Swami Maharaj Memorial Trust through Subhash A. Damle
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate Alka Dabir
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/771. P.P.Shree Vasudevanand Sarswati Maharaj and P.P. Lokanathteerth Swami Maharaj Memorial Trust through Subhash A. DamleVasudeo Niwas, 42/47 Erandwane Off Karve road,Pune 411004PuneMaha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Manager, UTI Mutual FundMahesh...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
INDIAN BANK MUTUAL FUND V/S T.S. SAWHNEY AND ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate MMR. GAUTAM AWASTHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 200 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 21/12/2006 in Complaint No. 166/1999 of the State Commission Delhi)1. T.S. SAWHNEY AND ORS.A-14, NIZAMUDDIN WEST NEW DELHI - 110013 -...........Appellant(s)Versus1. INDIAN BANK...
Case Number: 200
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2007
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2011
INDIA BANK MUTUAL FUND V/S T.S. SAWHNEY & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate MR. GAUTAM AWASTHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 235 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 21/12/2006 in Complaint No. C-167/1999 of the State Commission Delhi)1. T.S. SAWHNEY & ANR.A-14, NIZAMUDDING WEST, NEW DELHI -...........Appellant(s)Versus1. INDIA BANK MUTUAL ...
Case Number: 235
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2011
T.S. SAWHNEY AND ORS. V/S INDIAN BANK MUTUAL FUND
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GAUTAM AWASTHI
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 352 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 21/12/2006 in Complaint No. 166/1999 of the State Commission Delhi)1. INDIAN BANK MUTUAL FUND...........Appellant(s)Versus1. T.S. SAWHNEY AND ORS............Respondent(s) BEFOR...
Case Number: 352
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2007
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2011
D.S. SAWHNEY AND ORS. V/S INDIAN BANK MUTUAL FUND
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GAUTAM AWASTHI
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 353 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 21/12/2006 in Complaint No. 167/1999 of the State Commission Delhi)1. INDIAN BANK MUTUAL FUND...........Appellant(s)Versus1. D.S. SAWHNEY AND ORS............Respondent(s) BEFOR...
Case Number: 353
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2007
|
Date of Upload: 18-08-2011
UTI Mutual Fund V/S Dr. Suresh Dayanand Teckchandani
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate Rajendra Chaoudhary
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT.Admn. Bldg., 3rd Floor, Near Chetana College, Govt. Colony, Bandra(East), Mumbai-400 051.Complaint Case No. CC/09/172 1. Dr. Suresh Dayanand Teckchandani506, Basera, Plot No.11, Sector-17, Vashi, Navi Mumbai- 400703.Maha...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s UTI Mutual Fund V/S Mr. N.S. Prasad
Court Name: Hyderabad-III
Appelant Advocate M/s. K. Visweswara Rao
Respondant Advocate M/s. S.Venkateswarlu
Case Number: 1152
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 10-02-2022
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Mutual Fund in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Mutual Fund ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Mutual Fund under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.