Municipal Corporation
Latest Judgments
Total 576 Consumer Court Cases Against Municipal Corporation.
Thrissur Municipal Corporation V/S T.S.Ramachandran
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate Adv.K.N.Somakumar
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAyyanthole , ThrissurComplaint Case No. CC/08/531 1. T.S.RamachandranS/o.Seetharama Iyyer,Kalyan Extention,PoonkunnamThrissurKerala ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Thrissur Municipal Corporationrep by SecretarythrissurKerala ...........Respondent...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 09-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
NASHIK MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND 1 OTHERS V/S SHRI. MUKHTYARSINGH JAYSINGH PATIL AND 1 OTHERS
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate VIKASH TAKALKAR
Respondant Advocate Ms.Smita Gaidhani
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/10/302 1. SHRI. MUKHTYARSINGH JAYSINGH PATIL AND 1 OTHERSEKLORA NASHIK ROAD NASHIK NASHIKMAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. NASHIK MUNICIPAL CORPORATION...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 17-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
City Municipal Corporation V/S Sri.Mahadeva
Court Name: Mandya
Appelant Advocate Sri.K.M.Basavaraju (Kundur)
Respondant Advocate Sri M.B.Rajshekar
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANDYAD.C.Office Compound, Opp. District Court Premises, Mandya - 571 401.consumer case(CC) No. CC/10/12 Sri.Mahadeva ...........Appellant(s)Vs.City Municipal Corporation ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma2. Sri.M.N....
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
VADODARA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. V/S HITESH H BHATT
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 3178 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 25/06/2009 in Appeal No. 1448/2006 of the State Commission Gujarat) 1. HITESH H BHATT35/C, Dahiba Nager Society, Opp. Shreyas School, Manjalpur Naka,Vadodara-390011G...
Case Number: 3178
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2010
ANITA MITTAL V/S MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FARIDABAD
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MANJIT SINGH
Respondant Advocate -
Date of Filing: 31 May 2006 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/1370/2006(Against the Order dated 24/02/2006 in Appeal No. 811/2003 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FARIDABADFARIDABAD - - ...........Appella...
Case Number: 1370
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2006
|
Date of Upload: 11-03-2010
VIJAY WANTI AND ETC. V/S MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FARIDABAD
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MANJIT SINGH
Respondant Advocate -
Date of Filing: 03 Aug 2006 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/2114-2124/2006(Against the Order dated 24/02/2006 in Appeal No. 811/2003 of the State Commission Chandigarh) 1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FARIDABADCOMMISSIONER B,K,.CHOKE ...
Case Number: 2114
|
Date of Filing: 03-08-2006
|
Date of Upload: 11-03-2010
Mysore City Municipal Corporation V/S S.P.Thirumala Rao
Court Name: Mysore
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORENo.1542/F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysore-570009.Execution Application(EA) No. EA/09/109 S.P.Thirumala Rao ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Mysore City Municipal Corp...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION V/S NEW SARVODAYA CHS LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 21 Oct 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/3928-3929/2009(Against the Order dated 25/02/2009 in Appeal No. 72 & 73/2007 of the State Commission Maharastra) 1. NEW SARVODAYA CHS LTD.Plot Nos. 32/33, R.C. Road., ...
Case Number: 3928
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2009
|
Date of Upload: 22-12-2009
City Municipal Corporation V/S Sri.T.Srinivas
Court Name: Mandya
Appelant Advocate Sri.Yogananda
Respondant Advocate Sri M.B.Rajashekar
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANDYAD.C.Office Compound, Opp. District Court Premises, Mandya - 571 401.consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/89 Sri.T.Srinivas ...........Appellant(s)Vs.City Municipal Corporation ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma2. Sri.M....
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 23-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Thrissur Municipal Corporation Thrissur Corporation Electricity Department V/S The Arimpur Power Service
Municipal Corporation Electricity
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate Baby. P. Antony
Respondant Advocate M. Vinod and K. Suraj
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAyyanthole , Thrissurconsumer case(CC) No. op/04/49 The Arimpur Power Service ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Thrissur Municipal Corporation Thrissur Corporation Electricity Department Thrissur Corporation ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. Padmini Sudh...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 12-01-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Municipal Corporation in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Municipal Corporation ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Municipal Corporation under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.