company-name-logo

Municipal Corporation

Latest Judgments

Total 571 Consumer Court Cases Against Municipal Corporation.

Telangana

DY.COMMISSIONER GREATER HYDERABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION CIRCLE 2 OTHERS V/S K.CHIDAMBARAM , S/O LATE K.RAJAMALLAIAH

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: Medak

Appelant Advocate SRI.M.NARSIMLU

Respondant Advocate P.H.PANAGESWAR

CAUSE TITLE ANDJUDGEMENTComplaint Case No. CC/14/20111. K.CHIDAMBARAM , S/O LATE K.RAJAMALLAIAHH.NO.12-179, SRINAGAR COLONY PATANCHERU MEDAK DISTRICT...........Complainant(s)Versus1. DY.COMMISSIONER GREATER HYDERABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION CIRCLE 2 OTHERSPATANCHERU MEDAK DISTRICT....

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 15-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 08-03-2016

NCDRC

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FARIDABAD V/S B.S. VERMA

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI TRANSFER APPLICATION NO. 17-18 OF 20111. B.S. VERMAR/O E-305 EAST OF KAILASHDELHINEW DELHI...........Appellants(s)Versus1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FARIDABADB.K CHAUK, N.I.TFARIDABADHHARYANA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbs...

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 01-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 08-07-2011

Madhya Pradesh

Municipal Corporation Office Hoshangabad V/S Rohit Singh Pawar

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: Hoshangabad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 264

|

Date of Filing: 03-12-2010

|

Date of Upload: 19-02-2016

Chandigarh

Chandigarh Municipal Corporation V/S Manmohan Singh Kohli S/o Late S. Lal Singh Kohli,Advocate,

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate None for appellant

Respondant Advocate Sh.Sanjiv Ghai, Adv. for OPs

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019APPEAL NO. 206 of 2009 1. Manmohan Singh Kohli S/o Late S. Lal Singh Kohli,Advocate,Punjab and Haryana , High Court, , Chandigarh., ...........App...

Case Number: 206

|

Date of Filing: 17-04-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

Municipal Corporation V/S Navneet Sama

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sh. P.P.S. Doabia, Adv. for appellant

Respondant Advocate Sh.Sanjiv Ghai, Adv. for OP

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 98 of 2010 1. Navneet SamaMr. Naveneet Sama S/O Sh. V.K. Sama R/O H.No. 1115, Sector 40/B, Chandigarh.ChandigarhChandiigarh ........

Case Number: 98

|

Date of Filing: 04-03-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Sou. Rita Shyamlal Aahuja V/S Solapur Municipal Corporation Solapur, Through its Commissioner,

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Anand Kulkarni

Respondant Advocate Samir Minocha

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/07/865(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/06/2007 in Case No. CC/06/387 of District Solapur)1. Solapur Municipal Corporation Solapur, Through its Commissioner,Solapur Municipal Corpor...

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 09-07-2007

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

Municipal Corporation Officer Hoshangabad V/S Akhilesh Tiwari

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: Hoshangabad

Appelant Advocate Vishwas Soni

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 61

|

Date of Filing: 17-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 18-02-2016

Gujarat

Sunrise Technology V/S Municipal Corporation Vyara

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: Surat Addl

Appelant Advocate Nitin H. Shah

Respondant Advocate Sanjay Mithaiwala

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 01-12-2008

|

Date of Upload: 12-12-2019

Circuit Bench Aurangabad

Aurangabad Municipal Corporation Aurangabad V/S Darshansingh S/o. Indersingh Sodhi

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate P.N. Sonpethkar

Respondant Advocate ADv.

First Appeal No. A/181/2009(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Darshansingh S/o. Indersingh Sodhi R/o. Osmanapura Aurangabad BEFORE:HONABLE MRS. UMA BORA PRESIDING MEMBERHONABLE MR. K.B.GAWALI MEMBER PRESENT:None ......for the Appellant ADv. , Advocate ...

Case Number: 181

|

Date of Filing: 20-03-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Jan Mahiti Adhikari, Nagapur Municipal Corporation V/S Bhimrao R. Gedam

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate Adv. Parmar

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPUR.District Consumer Forum, 5th Floor, New Administrative Building, Civil Lines, Nagpur-440 001Complaint Case No. CC/10/417 1. Bhimrao R. GedamNagpur ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Jan Mahiti Adhikari, Nagapur Municipal Corporatio...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 13-07-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Municipal Corporation in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Municipal Corporation ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Municipal Corporation under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.