Municipal Corporation
Latest Judgments
Total 571 Consumer Court Cases Against Municipal Corporation.
Thrissur Municipal Corporation V/S E.D. Antony
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate N.K. Shridharan
Respondant Advocate M.R. Venugopal and K.B. Smitha
Complaint Case No. CC/07/4471. E.D. AntonyS/o Edakkalathur Devassy, Kuttur, Thrissur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Thrissur Municipal Corporation Rep. by Secretary2. Assistant SecretaryElectricity Section, Thrissur CorporationTrissurKerala3. Accounts OfficerElectricity Section...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Commissioner, Kolkata Municipal Corporation and aother V/S Kishore Butta
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/04/801. Kishore Butta1C, Pratap Aditya Road, Kolkata-700026.KolkataWest Bengal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Commissioner, Kolkata Municipal Corporation and aother5, S.N. Banerjee Road, Kolkata-700013.KolkataWest Bengal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: PR...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Mira-Bhayander Municipal Corporation V/S Shri. Kamalakar Shankar Bhomkar
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/05/990(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/03/2005 in Case No. 52/2004 of District Thane)1. Shri. Kamalakar Shankar BhomkarRes. at Flat No. 004/D-44, Sector No. 9, Shanti Nagar, Mira R...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
THE ESTATE OFFICER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR. V/S M/S. EIDER TELECOM LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.K. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. V.B. SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 04/07/2005 in Complaint No. 6/2005 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. M/S. EIDER TELECOM LTD.REGD OFFICE, SCO 914, NAC, MANIMAJRA, CHANDIGARH PUNJAB...........Appellant(s)Ver...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2007
|
Date of Upload: 19-10-2011
AVTAR SINGH V/S MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHANKAR CHILLARGE
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2574 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 18/03/2011 in Appeal No. 2715/2006 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONThrough it Assitant Director, Town PlanningAurangabadMaharastra..........
Case Number: 2574
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 04-10-2011
THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NAVI MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION V/S NAVI MUMBAI NAGARI SEVA SAMITTEE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate -
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/03/1843(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. First Appeal No. of District Thane)1. NAVI MUMBAI NAGARI SEVA SAMITTEE D-18/0:1, INCOME TAX COLONY, SEC, 21/22, CBD BELAPUR, N...
Case Number: 3
|
Date of Filing: 06-12-2003
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Chandigarh Municipal Corporation V/S Manmohan Singh Kohli S/o Late S. Lal Singh Kohli,Advocate,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Manmohan Singh Kohli, in person
Respondant Advocate Sh.Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate for the non-applicant/respondent
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 61 of 2011 1. Manmohan Singh Kohli S/o Late S. Lal Singh Kohli,Advocate,S/o Late S. Lal Singh Kohli, Advocate Punjab...
Case Number: 61
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MR B. C. PATIL AND ORS. V/S NAVI MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Adv. Mr. Jitendra Oak
Respondant Advocate Adv. Mr. S. Hussain
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/09/781(Arisen out of Order Dated 31/03/2009 in Case No. 211/2008 of District Additional DCF, Thane)1. NAVI MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION1ST FLOOR, BELAPUR BHAWAN, C.B.D., NAVI MU...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
GREATER HYDERABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (GHMC) & ANR. V/S SHAHNAZ BEGUM & ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 202 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 16/06/2010 in Complaint No. 3212/2010 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. SHAHNAZ BEGUM & ORS.R/o. 3rd Floor, 3-5-826, HydergudaHyderabadAndhra Pradesh2. SHUJAUDDIN...
Case Number: 202
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2011
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION WARANGAL. V/S Dr.G.YADAGIRI
Court Name: Warangal
Appelant Advocate V.SURESH
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 25-09-2020
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Municipal Corporation in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Municipal Corporation ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Municipal Corporation under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.