Court Name: Sangli
Appelant Advocate B.M.Patil
Respondant Advocate
Execution Application No. EA/08/1281. Smt.Gajrabai Balkrishna Parche1st Lane, Ganeshnagar, Sangli...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Commissioner, Sangli Miraj and Kupwad Municipal CorporationSangli...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. A.Y.Godase PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MRS. Geeta G...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate Adv.N.K.Shridharan,Shrikumar Nambanath
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAYYANTHOLETHRISSUR-3Complaint Case No. CC/09/1891. Paulson Antony.ESign Colour Lab,S/o.Edakkalathur Antony,Kolazhy,KutturthrissurKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Secretary,Thrissur Municipal CorporationThrissurThrissurKerala2. Asst.Secretar...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 13-03-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. O.P. GUPTA & MS. HIMANI GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 759 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 29/08/2011 in Appeal No. 664/2009 of the State Commission Delhi)1. NEHA GUPTAD/o Shri O.P Gupta, R/o B-5/95 Paschim ViharNew Delhi - 110063Delhi...........Petitioner...
Case Number: 759
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2012
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate N.K.shridharan
Respondant Advocate Johnson.T.Thomas.
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAYYANTHOLETHRISSUR-3Complaint Case No. CC/07/50( Date of Filing : 09 Jan 2007 )1. T.P.JayaprakashanThottupura House,Mission Quarters,Thrissur............Complainant(s)Versus1. The Thrissur Municipal Corporationrep by The secratary.2. Asst.Secratar...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 09-01-2007
|
Date of Upload: 03-11-2022
Municipal Corporation Railway Society
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S. SUKUMARAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3284-3285 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 18/01/2011 in Appeal No. 178&484/2010 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAIThrough the Municipal Commissioner, Mahapali...
Case Number: 3284
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 13-03-2012
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate N.K. Shridharan
Respondant Advocate M.R. Venugopal and K.B. Smitha
Complaint Case No. CC/07/4471. E.D. AntonyS/o Edakkalathur Devassy, Kuttur, Thrissur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Thrissur Municipal Corporation Rep. by Secretary2. Assistant SecretaryElectricity Section, Thrissur CorporationTrissurKerala3. Accounts OfficerElectricity Section...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/04/801. Kishore Butta1C, Pratap Aditya Road, Kolkata-700026.KolkataWest Bengal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Commissioner, Kolkata Municipal Corporation and aother5, S.N. Banerjee Road, Kolkata-700013.KolkataWest Bengal............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: PR...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/05/990(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/03/2005 in Case No. 52/2004 of District Thane)1. Shri. Kamalakar Shankar BhomkarRes. at Flat No. 004/D-44, Sector No. 9, Shanti Nagar, Mira R...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. S.K. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. V.B. SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 04/07/2005 in Complaint No. 6/2005 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. M/S. EIDER TELECOM LTD.REGD OFFICE, SCO 914, NAC, MANIMAJRA, CHANDIGARH PUNJAB...........Appellant(s)Ver...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2007
|
Date of Upload: 19-10-2011
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHANKAR CHILLARGE
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2574 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 18/03/2011 in Appeal No. 2715/2006 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONThrough it Assitant Director, Town PlanningAurangabadMaharastra..........
Case Number: 2574
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 04-10-2011
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Municipal Corporation in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Municipal Corporation ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Municipal Corporation under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.