Municipal Corporation
Latest Judgments
Total 576 Consumer Court Cases Against Municipal Corporation.
Municipal Corporation Office Hoshangabad V/S Ajeem Khan
Court Name: Hoshangabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 04-04-2016
Municipal Corporation Office Hoshangabad V/S Kanaiyalal Sarathe
Court Name: Hoshangabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 04-04-2016
CHIEF OFFICE JAIPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. V/S NARENDER KUMAR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. R. K. TEWARI & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate -
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1104 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 16/01/2008 in Appeal No. 920/2007 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. NARENDER KUMARType-IV, Quarter No. 40, Q-Block, G.P.R.A. Quarters, Near Akurdi Railway Statio...
Case Number: 1104
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2008
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2013
SHANUGANANDA WELFARE ASSOCIATION V/S SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GAURANG KANTH
Respondant Advocate MR. ROHIT JAIN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 991 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 01/03/2013 in Appeal No. 100/2013 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/1823/2013,IA/1824/20131. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONTHROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER, CITI CI...
Case Number: 991
|
Date of Filing: 14-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-05-2013
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation V/S Dr. Chodaram Guru Prasad
Court Name: Hyderabad-III
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 483
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 11-08-2016
Saiyyad Nijabuddin Mujibuddion V/S Nagpur Municipal Corporation Through its Municipal commissioner
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Aswini Palodkar
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/10/200(Arisen out of Order Dated 14/09/2009 in Case No. cc/09/156 of District None)1. Nagpur Municipal Corporatio...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 06-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & 2 ORS. V/S JAGAN NATH BRIJ KUMAR (P) LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SOURABH GOEL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 920 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 03/12/2012 in Appeal No. 361/2012 of the State Commission Chandigarh)1. JAGAN NATH BRIJ KUMAR (P) LTD.THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR, SH SURINDER SINGAL , REGD OFFICE , SCO NO...
Case Number: 920
|
Date of Filing: 08-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-04-2013
THE COMMISSIONER BOMBAY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. V/S MR. RAJESH K. CHAUDHARY
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Wavikar
Respondant Advocate D.B.Rathod
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/95/081. MR. RAJESH K. CHAUDHARY20, D LANE, MOTILAL NAGAR, NTOP HILL, MUMBAI-400022............Complainant(s)Versus1. THE COMMISSIONER BOMBAY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.MAH...
Case Number: 95
|
Date of Filing: 23-01-1995
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
PANKAJ V/S MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. CHOPRA & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3330 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 11/07/2012 in Appeal No. 567/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHIThrough its Commissioner Civic Centre,Minto RoadNew DelhiDelhi........
Case Number: 3330
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 25-03-2013
Secretary,Thrissur Municipal Corporation V/S Paulson Antony.E
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate Adv.Shrikumar Nambanath
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAYYANTHOLETHRISSUR-3Complaint Case No. CC/09/5221. Paulson Antony.ES/o.Edakkalathur Antony,Kuttur,Kolazhy-Proprietor,Sign colour Lab,Round west,ThrissurThrissurKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Secretary,Thrissur Municipal CorporationThrissu...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 27-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Municipal Corporation in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Municipal Corporation ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Municipal Corporation under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.