Municipal Corporation
Latest Judgments
Total 576 Consumer Court Cases Against Municipal Corporation.
COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & 2 ORS. V/S V.K. CHATURVEDI
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1453 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 18/07/2007 in Appeal No. 1035/2007 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. V.K. CHATURVEDIS/o late Shri HC Chaturvedi, R/o Sector-16, H.No-256/5 VasundharaGhaziaba...
Case Number: 1453
|
Date of Filing: 10-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 06-02-2014
GUNTUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION V/S M/S. VENKATESWARA HOUSING PVT. LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. G V R CHOUDARY, MR. A. CHANDRA SEKHAR & MR. K.S.R. PRASAD
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 686 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 26/09/2012 in Appeal No. 875/2011 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh) WITH IA/1244/2013,IA/1245/20131. M/S. VENKATESWARA HOUSING PVT. LTD.S/O GOPALA RAO. D.NO- ...
Case Number: 686
|
Date of Filing: 21-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-02-2014
SECRETARY, THRISSUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND OTHERS V/S PAULSON ANTONY
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SHRIKUMAR NAMBANATH AND MARTIN PAUL
Respondant Advocate
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/13/262(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/11/2012 in Case No. First Appeal No. 190/2007 of District Trissur)1. PAULSON ANTONYEDAKALATHUR HOUSE, KUTTUR,THRISSUR...........Appellant(s)Ver...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 01-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
GAURA DEVI V/S SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. ANUJA SAXENA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3208 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 06/05/2013 in Appeal No. 809/2012 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/5618/2013,IA/5821/20131. SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONTHROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER, SDMC, ...
Case Number: 3208
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-01-2014
RAKESH DHAWAN & ORS V/S MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMIT K. PAUL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 261 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 27/05/2008 in Complaint No. 110/2006 of the State Commission Delhi)1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHITown HallDelhi...........Appellant(s)Versus1. RAKESH DHAWAN & ORS F-11...
Case Number: 261
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 24-01-2014
THANE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION V/S SHEETAL JAMES & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 419 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 08/06/2011 in Complaint No. 118/2011 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. SHEETAL JAMES & ANR.Miss. Monica James Sheetal James Farm, Survey No. 12, Hissa 1 A, Yeoor, Pao...
Case Number: 419
|
Date of Filing: 19-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2013
THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION V/S SRI SHYAM SUNDAR JALAN
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate Achinta Chanda
cause list8B,Nelie Sengupta Sarani,7th Floor,Kolkata-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/365/2012 1. SRI SHYAM SUNDAR JALAN 20,MANICKBOSE GHAT STREET,KOLKATA-700006,P.S-JORABAGAN. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION5,S.N BANERJEE ROAD,KOLKATA-700013,P.S-NE...
Case Number: 365
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Shri B C Patil V/S Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate J H Oak
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. FA/13/37(Arisen out of Order Dated 12/12/2012 in Case No. 211/2008 of District Additional DCF, Thane)1. Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation 1st Floor, Belapur Bhavan, CBD Navi Mubma...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
1. Murala Seetharamayya, S/o. Rajeswara Rao, Aged about 37 Years, Occ: Business, R/o. D.No.16B-17-36 V/S The Commissiner, Vijayawada Municipal Corporation Vijayawada, Krishna District.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. Smt. G.Jhansi
Respondant Advocate M/s K. Jyothi Prasad ? R1
FA No: 642 Of 2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 22/05/2012 in Case No. CC/187/2010 of District Krishna at Vijaywada)1. The Commissiner, Vijayawada Municipal Corporation Vijayawada, Krishna District............Appellant(s)Versus1. 1. Murala Seetharamayya, S/o. Rajeswara Rao, Aged abo...
Case Number: 642
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Kolkata Municipal Corporation & Another V/S Rabindra Nath Pal
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate Siddhartha Ghosh
Respondant Advocate Raghu Nath Chakrabarty
cause list8B,Nelie Sengupta Sarani,7th Floor,Kolkata-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/123/2012 1. Rabindra Nath Pal6, Bakul Bagan Road, KOlkata-700 025. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Kolkata Municipal Corporation & AnotherC/o Municipal Commissioner, 5, S. N. Banerjee Road, P.S. Ne...
Case Number: 123
|
Date of Filing: 03-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Municipal Corporation in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Municipal Corporation ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Municipal Corporation under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.