company-name-logo

Municipal Corporation

Latest Judgments

Total 576 Consumer Court Cases Against Municipal Corporation.

Gujarat

RIPPLE AQUA SPORTS V/S VADODARA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Municipal Corporation   Sports  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate NILESH A PANDYA

Respondant Advocate V P NANAVATY

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 24-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 07-04-2015

Gujarat

ORIENTAL INS CO LTD V/S VADODARA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate NILESH A PANDYA

Respondant Advocate H J BHATT

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 24-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 07-04-2015

Gujarat

RIPPLE AQUA SPORTS V/S VADODARA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Municipal Corporation   Sports  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate NILESH A PANDYA

Respondant Advocate V P NANAVATY

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 24-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 07-04-2015

Maharashtra

THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF THANE AND ORS. V/S MR. MARUTI B. PATIL AND ORS.

Municipal Corporation   Maruti  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/03/1771. MR. MARUTI B. PATIL AND ORS.FLAT NO.30/302, 2ND FLR, A WING, NILKANTHA TOWERS, RAM MARUTI RD, NAUPADA, THANE............Complainant(s)Versus1. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORAT...

Case Number: 3

|

Date of Filing: 21-06-2003

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION V/S MR. DASHRATH M. PHADKE

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate MR. U.B.WAVIKAR

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIComplaint Case No. CC/01/1651. MR. DASHRATH M. PHADKEMUMBAI............Complainant(s)Versus1. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MUMBAI.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Shashikant A. Kulkarni PR...

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 03-05-2001

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

West Bengal

The Commissioner, Asansol Municipal Corporation V/S Smt. Syamali Sarkar

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. Bappaditya Mali Mr. Chiranjib Bhattacharyya

Respondant Advocate Mr. Madhav Banerjee

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. FA/1143/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 23/09/2013 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/100/2010 of District Burdwan)1. Smt. Syamali SarkarW/o Sri Jagannath Sarkar, 'Lord...

Case Number: 1143

|

Date of Filing: 22-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Circuit Bench Nagpur

Nagpur Municipal Corporation through Municipal Commissioner Civil lines Nagpur V/S Diwakar Balkrishna Tole

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Shridhaar V Purohit

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 24-06-2010

|

Date of Upload: 28-05-2015

Delhi

NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR. V/S SMT. SHOBHA ANAND MOHATTA

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986First Appeal No. A/1063/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/09/2014 in Case No. CC/952/2011 of District New Delhi)1. SMT. SHOBHA ANAND MOHATTA6/7, RATNAKAR BUILDING, NARAYAN DABHOLKAR ROAD,...

Case Number: 1063

|

Date of Filing: 14-11-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

West Bengal

Howrah Municipal Corporation V/S SMT. MANISHA RAKSHIT

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: Howrah

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah 711 101.Office (033) 2638 0892, Confonet (033) 2638 0512 Fax (033) 2638 0892Complaint Case No. CC/14/3981. SMT. MANISHA RAKSHITW/O sri Ranjit Rakshit, Ichapur, Santragachi, P.s. Jagacha, Dist Howrah2. Sm...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 17-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Municipal Corporation in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Municipal Corporation ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Municipal Corporation under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.