company-name-logo

Municipal Corporation

Latest Judgments

Total 576 Consumer Court Cases Against Municipal Corporation.

Maharashtra

Honble Commissioner Nagpur Municipal Corporation V/S Navin Subhedar Nagri Sahakari Patsantha Maryadit Nagpur Shriram Vithobaji Mandaskar

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate Roshan Bagde

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/14/5601. Navin Subhedar Nagri Sahakari Patsantha Maryadit Nagpur Shriram Vithobaji MandaskarSubhedar Lay Out Nagpur NagpurMaharastra...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 26-11-2014

|

Date of Upload: 19-12-2016

West Bengal

The Kolkata Municipal Corporation V/S Shri Khudiram Mondal

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: Kolkata-III(South)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT-III(South),West Bengal18, Judges Court Road, Kolkata 700027Complaint Case No. CC/252/20161. Shri Khudiram MondalS/O Late Brindaban Mondal, 124/1, Briji road, purbapara, p.O.- Garfa, P.S.- Patuli, Kol-84............Complainant(s)Versus1...

Case Number: 252

|

Date of Filing: 16-06-2016

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2016

Himachal Pradesh

Municipal Corporation V/S Deepak Sood

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: Shimla

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate swaran Sharma

Case Number: 130

|

Date of Filing: 24-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 19-12-2016

Punjab

Municipal Corporation V/S Varinder Singh Bhatia

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: Amritsar

Appelant Advocate Deepinder Singh

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/16/3661. Varinder Singh BhatiaB-26, Ranjit Avenue, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Municipal CorporationAmritsarAmritsarPunjab......

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 02-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 06-12-2016

Maharashtra

Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai V/S Krishna Tukaram Sakpal

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Dr. Binoy Gupta

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 07-01-2016

|

Date of Upload: 24-11-2016

Orissa

The Commissioner,Cuttack Municipal Corporation V/S Dipak Ranjan Behera

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: Cuttak

Appelant Advocate J K Mohanty

Respondant Advocate B Mohapatra

IN THE COURT OF THE DIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,CUTTACK.C.C No.77/2015Dipak Ranjan Behera,At:Ramdaspur(Godisahi),P.S:Baranga,Dist:Cuttack. … Complainant.Vrs.The Commissioner,Cuttack Municipal Corporation,At:Choudhury Bazar.P.S:Purighat,Dist:Cuttack. … Op...

Case Number: 77

|

Date of Filing: 01-08-2015

|

Date of Upload: 03-11-2016

Maharashtra

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI V/S MR. KUSUM YOGENDRA JAISWAR

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)

Appelant Advocate ADV. VIKAS J. SINGH

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICTADMINISTRATIVE BLDG, NEAR DR.BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR GARDEN , BANDRA (E), MUMBAI-400051Complaint Case No. CC/78/20161. MR. KUSUM YOGENDRA JAISWAR ROOM NOL.37, KADAM WADI HANUMAN NAGAR, KANDIVALI EAST, MUMBAI 400 0101.............

Case Number: 78

|

Date of Filing: 08-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 19-10-2016

Telangana

1. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation V/S M.s. NR Biomedical Engineers Pvt. Ltd.,

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M.s.B.G. Narendra Babu P.I.P

Respondant Advocate M/s. Pannaga sai

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaComplaint Case No. CC/78/20141. M.s. NR Biomedical Engineers Pvt. Ltd.,24.92, Laxmi Narayan Nagar Industrial Area, Uppal, Hyderabad 500 039 Rep. by B.G. Narendra Babu Son of B. Ganpath Rao...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. Greater...

Case Number: 78

|

Date of Filing: 18-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 21-10-2016

Haryana

The executive Officer-cum- Secretary, Municipal Corporation V/S Lalit Mohan S/o Karam Chand

Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: Yamunanagar

Appelant Advocate Sudesh Sharma

Respondant Advocate

Lalit Mohan Versus EO MC YNR.CC No. 368 of 2016.Present: Sh. Sudesh Sharma, Advocate, counsel for complainant. Counsel for the complainant made a statement recorded separately that there is some technical defect in the present complaint, so, he withdraws the same and prayed for r...

Case Number: 368

|

Date of Filing: 07-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 27-10-2016

Bihar

Estate Officer, Patna Regional Development Authority Now Patna Municipal Corporation , and Other, V/S Savitri Ojha,

Development Authority   Municipal Corporation  

Court Name: Patna

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMPATNA, BIHARComplaint Case No. CC/485/2009( Date of Filing : 16 Nov 2009 )1. Savitri Ojha, W/o- Sri K.M. Ojha, R/o- Flat no. B-101, Type-M5, Road No. 10B, Rajendra Nagar, Patna-1...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Estate Officer, Patna Regional Development Au...

Case Number: 485

|

Date of Filing: 16-11-2009

|

Date of Upload: 06-12-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Municipal Corporation in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Municipal Corporation ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Municipal Corporation under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.