Municipal Corporation
Latest Judgments
Total 576 Consumer Court Cases Against Municipal Corporation.
The City Municipal Corporation V/S Raju.D
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate K.B.Gopal Gowda
Respondant Advocate
KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.First Appeal No. A/111/2021( Date of Filing : 03 Feb 2021 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/10/2020 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/41/2020 of District Shimoga)1. Raju.DS/o Late Doddaiaha, Aged about 7...
Case Number: 111
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2021
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2021
The Municipal Corporation V/S Parminder Singh
Court Name: Jalandhar
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sunil Mehta
Respondant Advocate
Distt Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionLadowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/202/2021( Date of Filing : 01 Jun 2021 )1. Parminder Singh son of Gurdev Singh aged 52years resident of House no.EG-46 Road...
Case Number: 202
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2021
|
Date of Upload: 21-06-2021
The Chief Manager Telangana Grameena Bank V/S Mohan Manchippa S/o Gangaram aged 43 years Occ Municipal Corporation employee
Telangana Grameena Bank Municipal Corporation Telangana
Court Name: Nizamabad
Appelant Advocate Sri R.S.L.Goud and G.Naveen Reddy
Respondant Advocate B.Chinna Reddy
Case Number: 57
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2021
MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER NAGPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION V/S NANDKISHOR SUDHAKR BADHE
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate ADV RITESH BADHE
Respondant Advocate ADV. AMIT PRASAD
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/723/2019( Date of Filing : 30 Dec 2019 )1. NANDKISHOR SUDHAKR BADHEB-1, SHANTIPURSH APARTMENT, 128, SHIVAJI NAGAR NAGPUR 440010...
Case Number: 723
|
Date of Filing: 30-12-2019
|
Date of Upload: 21-12-2020
Municipal Corporation V/S Harpreet Singh
Court Name: Amritsar
Appelant Advocate Deepinder Singh
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsar, PunjabComplaint Case No. CC/355/2020( Date of Filing : 14 Sep 2020 )1. Harpreet SinghHouse No.1151/8, Gali Gandan Wali, Nimak Mandi, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Complain...
Case Number: 355
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2020
|
Date of Upload: 27-11-2020
VED PRAKASH V/S MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MUKESH GUPTA & MR. D.S. MAHENDRA
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4681 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 07/09/2010 in Appeal No. 512/2009 of the State Commission Delhi)1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHIThrough its Commissioner, Town Hall Chandni ChowkDelhi - 110006Delh...
Case Number: 4681
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 20-11-2020
Surekha Sood V/S The Municipal Corporation Kapurthala and another
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amarpreet Singh Bains
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 286
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2020
|
Date of Upload: 23-11-2020
PANKAJ K TEVANI V/S SURAT MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate C J VIN
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2020
|
Date of Upload: 27-10-2020
Commissioner, Rourkela, Municipal Corporation V/S Pravas Mangaraj
Court Name: Sundargarh II
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSUNDARGARH-II, ROURKELAComplaint Case No. CC/50/2020( Date of Filing : 13 Aug 2020 )1. Pravas MangarajHouse No. DL/22, Basanti Colony, Rourkela-769012SundargarhOdisha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Commissioner, Rourkela, Municipal Corp...
Case Number: 50
|
Date of Filing: 13-08-2020
|
Date of Upload: 20-10-2020
COMMISSIONER MUNICIPAL CORPORATION JAGDALPUR V/S SUBRAT CHAKRAVATI
Court Name: Baster
Appelant Advocate HRI AWADH KISHOR SHRMA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 20
|
Date of Filing: 03-03-2020
|
Date of Upload: 05-09-2020
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Municipal Corporation in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Municipal Corporation ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Municipal Corporation under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.