Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.Review Application No. RA/106/2022( Date of Filing : 21 Oct 2022 )InFirst Appeal No. A/1322/20121. Ravindra MundeAge: 40 years, Occ: Sculptor, Moreshwar Co-op. Society, 2/9, Kulkarni Wadi, Ganesh Maid...
Case Number: 106
|
Date of Filing: 21-10-2022
|
Date of Upload: 31-12-2022
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-II,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:618 of 2020Date of Institution:11.11.2020Date of Decision:11.08.2022Somesh Gupta s/o Sh.K.L.Gupta, R/o H.No.5739, Sector 38 (West), Chandigarh. …..ComplainantVersusSub Divisional Engine...
Case Number: 618
|
Date of Filing: 13-11-2020
|
Date of Upload: 26-08-2022
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-III (WEST)C-150-151, COMMUNITY CENTRE, JANAKPURI,NEW DELHI-110058CASE NO. 291/22IN THE MATTERS OF:-Vikas Lakra ……COMPLAINANTVERSUSSouth Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr. ……OPPOSITE PARTY Coram: S...
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 25-07-2022
|
Date of Upload: 04-08-2022
Court Name: Rohtak
Appelant Advocate Sh. Ashwani Kumar
Respondant Advocate Sh. K.K. Luthra
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Rohtak.Haryana. Complaint Case No. CC/19/122( Date of Filing : 13 Mar 2019 )1. Mr. Deepanshu JakharS/o Mr. Raj Kumar R/o 1523/31 Kamla Nagar Rohtak. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Commissioner Municipal CorporationThe Commissione...
Case Number: 19
|
Date of Filing: 13-03-2019
|
Date of Upload: 10-08-2022
Court Name: Patna
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMPATNA, BIHARComplaint Case No. CC/556/2018( Date of Filing : 12 Dec 2018 )1. Sri Radhe Prasad, S/o- Late Dasrath Singh, R/o- Nandlal Chhapra, P.S- Agamkuan, Distt- patna, ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Patna Municipal Corporation and Other,Through its Mu...
Case Number: 556
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 10-08-2022
Court Name: Barnala
Appelant Advocate Deepinder Singh
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. RBT/CC/18/3151. Harjinder Singh ChahalC-2353, Ranjit Avenue, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Municipal CorporationRAnjit Avenue, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Sh.Ashish Kumar Grover PRE...
Case Number: 0
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2018
|
Date of Upload: 04-08-2022
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application No.58 of 2022in CC/29/2021Shailesh Mani Tripathi Vs The Municipal Corporation Chandigarh & anr. BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Complainant in...
Case Number: 58
|
Date of Filing: 17-05-2022
|
Date of Upload: 22-06-2022
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate Shrikumar Nambanath
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAYYANTHOLETHRISSUR-3Complaint Case No. CC/22/259( Date of Filing : 19 May 2022 )1. Janardhanan.K.Kkandampully House,Punkunnam,Thrissur2. Sheela Janardhanan-...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Secretary,THrissur Municipal corporation ThrissurMunicipa...
Case Number: 22
|
Date of Filing: 19-05-2022
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Smt Geerija Patil
Respondant Advocate I.G Gachinamath
:ORDER:BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER. This appeal is filed by the appellant/Opposite Party being aggrieved by the order dated:30.05.2022 passed by the Dharwad District Consumer Commission in C.C.No.29/2012, which allowed the complaint filed by the complainant directing thi...
Case Number: 1322
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 25-07-2022
Court Name: Burdwan
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION166 Nivedita Pally, G.T. Road, P.O. Sripally,Dist Purba Bardhaman - 713103WEST BENGALComplaint Case No. CC/106/2021( Date of Filing : 10 Aug 2021 )1. Smt. Gopa Paul 3rd Floor,Shreemati Tower , Benimadhab Nagar ,Near Budha Petrol pump...
Case Number: 106
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2021
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2022
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Municipal Corporation in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Municipal Corporation ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Municipal Corporation under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.