Mtnl
Latest Judgments
Total 27 Consumer Court Cases Against Mtnl.
MTNL V/S DR RAMAKANT SHARMA
Court Name: Additional DCF, Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION MUMBAI SUBURBAN ADDITIONALAdministrative Building, 3rd Floor, Near Chetana CollegeBandra (East), Mumbai-400 051Complaint Case No. CC/82/2023( Date of Filing : 02 May 2023 )1. DR RAMAKANT SHARMA402 SHRI RAM NIWAS TATTA NIWASI CHS PES...
Case Number: 82
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2023
|
Date of Upload: 19-08-2024
MTNL V/S SARDAR SINGH
Court Name: South West
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/43/2013( Date of Filing : 10 Jan 2013 )1. SARDAR SINGH ............Complainant(s)Versus1. MTNL .............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. SH,SURESH KUMAR GUPTA PRESIDENTHON'BLE MS. HARSHALI KAUR MEMBERHON'BLE MR. RAMESH CHAND YADAV MEMBER ...
Case Number: 43
|
Date of Filing: 10-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 04-07-2024
THE OFFICE INCHARGE FOUNTAIN MTNL SERVICE CENTRE V/S DR MANOHAR BHIKAJI RAWATE
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2023
|
Date of Upload: 06-03-2024
MTNL V/S YOGIDIVINE SOCIETY
Court Name: North West
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION-V, NORTH-WEST GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.Complaint Case No. CC/355/2016( Date of Filing : 16 Mar 2016 )1. YOGIDIVINE SOCIETYTHROUGH ITS AUTHRIZED REPRESENTATIVE, PRABHAKAR RAO, TAADDEV,KAK...
Case Number: 355
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-12-2023
GENERAL MANAGER WEST MTNL V/S JAGDISH
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-III (WEST)C-150-151, COMMUNITY CENTRE, JANAKPURI,NEW DELHI-110058LOK ADALAT : 10.12.2023E.A. 28/2023 Date of order: 10.12.2023Jagdish Singh Chauhan Vs General Manager MTNLPresent :- DH in person.DH states that he has already recei...
Case Number: 23
|
Date of Filing: 27-04-2023
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2023
MTNL V/S PREM CHAND JAIN
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Earlier the complaint was received from PGMS and it was registered in this Commission. After perusing the record it was observed that there is no address of the complainant and a letter was written to the PGMS Cell for providing the address of the complainant. No address has been...
Case Number: 50
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2022
|
Date of Upload: 01-03-2023
MR. GUPTA R. PRASAD PROP. JAIBHARAT DUGDHALAYA V/S CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR MTNL AND ORS.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2001
|
Date of Upload: 08-02-2023
MTNL V/S Arvind kumar
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-III: WESTGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHIC-BLOCK, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PANKHA ROAD, JANAK PURI NEW DELHIComplaint Case No.151/2016In the matter of:Arvind KumarS/o Shri Mukat Lal,R/o C-598, Vikas Puri,New Delhi- 110018 ........ComplainantVersusAre...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 23-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-10-2022
GENERAL MANAGER WEST MTNL V/S JAGDISH
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION-III: WESTGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHIC-BLOCK, COMMUNITY CENTRE, PANKHA ROAD, JANAK PURI NEW DELHI-110058Complaint Case No.346/2015In the matter of:Jagdish Singh ChauhanR/o A-402, Sector 10/33,New Cosmopolitan CGHS Ltd.,Dwarka, New Delhi 11...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 13-09-2022
MTNL V/S SATISH BERRY
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Through V.C.Present: None for complainantComplainant statement is on record requesting to withdraw the matter. Allowed.Therefore, the matter is disposed off as withdrawan.File be consigned to Record room.Orders given dasti to parties....
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2021
|
Date of Upload: 14-03-2022
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Mtnl in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Mtnl ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Mtnl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.