Msedcl
Latest Judgments
Total 545 Consumer Court Cases Against Msedcl.
MSEDCL THROUGH ASSTT.ENGINEER V/S KISAN S. PATIL
Court Name: Wardha
Appelant Advocate SING
Respondant Advocate PUREKAR
11CONSUMER CASE NO. 74 of 2010 1. KISAN S. PATILR/O PULGAONWARDHAMAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. MSEDCL THROUGH ASSTT.ENGINEERSUB DIVISION PULGAONWARDHAMAHARASHTRA2. M.S.E.D.C.L. THROUGH CHEIF EX.ENG.ARVIWARDHAMAHARASHTRA ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : Fo...
Case Number: 74
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Executive Engg. MSEDCL Parbhani V/S Jaysing Dnyanobarao Kachwe
Court Name: Parbhani
Appelant Advocate Adv. A.A. Gite
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Court,PARBHANIDistrict Consumer Court ,New Administrative Building,Near Telephone Bhavan PARBHANIComplaint Case No. CC/10/141 1. Jaysing Dnyanobarao KachweR/O Krishi Sarathi colony Basmat RoadParbhaniMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Executive Engg. M...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 15-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MSEDCL Jalna V/S Ganesh Babulal Pardeshi
Court Name: Jalna
Appelant Advocate D.S. Mahajan
Respondant Advocate G.R.Kad
REPORTSSurvey No.488 Opp. Krida Bhavan bypass road JalnaCONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 97 1. Ganesh Babulal PardeshiR/o Bhaji Mandi, JalnaJalnaMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. MSEDCL JalnaMastgad, JalnaJalnaMaharashtra ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant :D.S. Mahajan,...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Executive Engineer, MSEDCL V/S Gourishankar Mahipal Damahe
Court Name: Gondia
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Adv. Rajankar
Registrar, District Consumer Forum, GondiaCollectorate Building, Room No. 214, Fulchur Road, GondiaComplaint Case No. CC/10/62 1. Gourishankar Mahipal DamaheDasgaon (B), GondiaGondiaMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Executive Engineer, MSEDCLDivisional Office, ramnagar...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 06-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MSEDCL Jalna V/S Premalabai Kashinath Padole
Court Name: Jalna
Appelant Advocate S.M. Dhannawat
Respondant Advocate
REPORTSSurvey No.488 Opp. Krida Bhavan bypass road JalnaCONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 101 1. Premalabai Kashinath PadoleNear Jain Mandir, Jawarbagh, New JalnaJalnaMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. MSEDCL JalnaUrban Sub. Division JalnaJalnaMaharashtra ...........Respondent(s) Fo...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MSEDCL Jalna V/S Yogesh Babasahab Dhawale
Court Name: Jalna
Appelant Advocate M. R. Waghunde
Respondant Advocate
REPORTSSurvey No.488 Opp. Krida Bhavan bypass road JalnaCONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 100 1. Yogesh Babasahab DhawaleR/o DaregaonJalnaMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. MSEDCL JalnaJalnaJalnaMaharashtra2. Ex. Engineer, M.S.E.D.Co.Ltd.Mastgad, JalnaJalnaMaharashtra3. Jr.Engineer, ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MSEDCL Jalna V/S Namdev Ananda Wahule
Court Name: Jalna
Appelant Advocate M. R. Waghunde
Respondant Advocate G.R.Kad
REPORTSSurvey No.488 Opp. Krida Bhavan bypass road JalnaCONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 99 1. Namdev Ananda WahuleR/o Daregaon, Tq. JalnaJalnaMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. MSEDCL JalnaJalnaJalnaMaharashtra2. Executive Engineer, Maharashtra State Electicity D.Co.Ltd.Mastgad, Ja...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MSEDCL Through its Superintending Engineer V/S Chief officer Municipal Council Chandur Railway
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 598
|
Date of Filing: 05-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2016
Smt.Sindhutai Gajanan Navankar Residing at V/S Executive Engineer MSEDCL urban Division Shrikrishana Peth
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 272
|
Date of Filing: 29-03-2008
|
Date of Upload: 10-02-2016
Mahommad Ayyub Shaikh Saif V/S Executive Engineer MSEDCL
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 727
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2009
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Msedcl in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Msedcl ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Msedcl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.