Court Name: Osmanabad
Appelant Advocate B.N.DESHMUKH
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2016
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate ADV.KULKARNI
Respondant Advocate ADV.A.M.QUAZI
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Miscellaneous Application No. MA/11/201. Shri Sunil Madhukarrao NagarkarNagpurNagpurMAHARASHTRA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. MSEDCLNagpurNagpurMAHARASH...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 31-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Gadchiroli
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Execution Application No. EA/11/71. Vivek Balram KhevleVadhdha Tah armoriGadchiroliMaharastra...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Assit. Engineer, MSEDCLTah ArmoriGadchiroliMaharastra2. Junior Engineer MSEDCLTah ArmoriGadchiroliMaharastra...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HONORABLE Shri....
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV. DANDIGE
Respondant Advocate ADV. CHOUDHARY
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/07/255(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. CC/05/65 of District Gondiya)1. MSEDCLGONDIA BEFORE: Hon'ble Mr...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV. KARMARKAR
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/2000/450(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/01/2000 in Case No. CC/99/145 of District )1. MSEDCLAKOLA...........Appella...
Case Number: 2000
|
Date of Filing: 20-10-2000
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Gadchiroli
Appelant Advocate Adv.Samajdar
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/181. Sanchit Anil Mandal Visapur, Kotgal, GadchiroliMaharastra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Junior Engineer, Shri Khade MSEDCLComplex, GadchiroliGadchiroliMaharastra2. Executive Engineer, Shri Barapatre, MSEDCLGadchiroliGadchiroliMaharastra..............
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Gondia
Appelant Advocate Adv. Katre
Respondant Advocate Adv. Sangdiwar
Complaint Case No. CC/11/71. Shobelal Mohanlal Katredhantoli, tah salekasaGondiaMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Balaji Domaji Mate, MSEDCL DeoriExecutive & Dy. engineer, MSEDCL Deori Office, Tah DeoriGondiaMaharashtra2. Ramesh Tukaram Sawarkar junior Engineer , Msedc...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Gondia
Appelant Advocate Adv. Rahangadale
Respondant Advocate Adv. rajankar
Registrar, District Consumer Forum, GondiaCollectorate Building, Room No. 214, Fulchur Road, GondiaComplaint Case No. CC/10/78 1. Devakabai Jaipal MeharThrough Ramkrushna Jaipal Mehar, R/o Fulchur Peth, Near I.T.I. GondiaGondiaMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Nikhil U...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 31-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Parbhani
Appelant Advocate Adv. Vijay Kaldate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Court,PARBHANIDistrict Consumer Court ,New Administrative Building,Near Telephone Bhavan PARBHANIComplaint Case No. CC/10/131 1. Shri Kailash Shankarlal ParekhR/O New Mondha ParbhaniParbhaniMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. MSEDCL Ltd. Through Its Exe...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 14-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Parbhani
Appelant Advocate Adv. J.N. Ghuge
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Court,PARBHANIDistrict Consumer Court ,New Administrative Building,Near Telephone Bhavan PARBHANIComplaint Case No. CC/10/145 1. Gajanan Bhiwaji WahamareR/O DharamapuriParbhaniMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Junior Engineer MSEDCLR/o ParbhaniParbhha...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Msedcl in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Msedcl ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Msedcl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.