company-name-logo

Msedcl

Latest Judgments

Total 545 Consumer Court Cases Against Msedcl.

Maharashtra

The Executive Engineer MSEDCL V/S Sakilabi W/o Moin Atar

Msedcl  

Court Name: Aurangabad

Appelant Advocate Adv B J Chavan

Respondant Advocate Adv

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 06-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-06-2015

Maharashtra

MSEDCL V/S Ajabrao Uttam Tambakhe

Msedcl  

Court Name: Yavatmal

Appelant Advocate Adv. Deshpande

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 08-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 29-05-2015

Maharashtra

1) Execative Engineer, MSEDCL V/S Sao Savita Pravin Mirkar

Msedcl  

Court Name: Jalna

Appelant Advocate K.S.Satkar

Respondant Advocate

Dist Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, JalnaSurvey No.488 Bypass Road, JalnaComplaint Case No. CC/56/20141. Sao Savita Pravin MirkarR/o Aalapur, Tq.Bhokerdan.JalnaMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1) Execative Engineer, MSEDCLJalnaJalnaMaharashtra2. 2) Executive Engin...

Case Number: 56

|

Date of Filing: 18-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Asst Executive Engineer MSEDCl V/S Balvant S/o Gangadhar Talegaonkar

Msedcl  

Court Name: Aurangabad

Appelant Advocate Adv

Respondant Advocate Adv

जिल्‍हा ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच, औरंगाबाद________________________________________________________________________________________________ग्राहक तक्रार क्रमांक :-412/20...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 04-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 16-03-2015

Maharashtra

D.P.Kolkar, sun Engg. MSEDCL Washim V/S Bhojraj Khupchand Totla

Msedcl  

Court Name: Washim

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate C.S. Poddar

JudgmentFinal OrderExecution Application No. EA/4/2013InComplaint Case No. CC/10/20121. Bhojraj Khupchand TotlaAt. Kalamba Mahali, Tq. Dist. Washim...........Appellant(s)Versus1. D.P.Kolkar, sun Engg. MSEDCL WashimPusad Naka, Washim...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MRS. Smt...

Case Number: 4

|

Date of Filing: 28-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

MSEDCl V/S Ashok Kisan Rajale

Msedcl  

Court Name: Aurangabad

Appelant Advocate Adv P R Sanluke

Respondant Advocate Adv

जिल्‍हा ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच, औरंगाबाद________________________________________________________________________________________________ग्राहक तक्रार क्रमांक :-299/20...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 23-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 12-03-2015

Maharashtra

Asst.Engineer MSEDCl V/S Ratnakar S/o Vasant Ekbote

Msedcl  

Court Name: Aurangabad

Appelant Advocate Adv

Respondant Advocate Adv

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 16-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-06-2015

Maharashtra

Executive Engineer, MSEDCL V/S Smt.Basantabai Bhayyalal Sura

Msedcl  

Court Name: Jalna

Appelant Advocate B. B. Veer

Respondant Advocate

Dist Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, JalnaSurvey No.488 Bypass Road, JalnaComplaint Case No. CC/44/20141. Smt.Basantabai Bhayyalal SuraAlankar Talkis Road, JalnaJalnaMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Executive Engineer, MSEDCLMastgad, JalnaJalnaMaharashtra.............

Case Number: 44

|

Date of Filing: 03-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

MSEDCL THROUGH ASSTT.ENGINEER V/S KISAN S. PATIL

Msedcl  

Court Name: Wardha

Appelant Advocate SING

Respondant Advocate

DIST. CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSEWAGRAM ROADNEAR YASHWANT COLLEGEWARDHA-442001MAHARASHTRA (PH.NO.07152-243550 )Execution Application No. EA/13/2012InComplaint Case No. CC/74/20101. KISAN S. PATILR/O PULGAONWARDHAMAHARASHTRA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. MSEDCL THROUGH AS...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 11-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Chief Engg. MSEDCL Washim V/S Sukhdeo Bhanu Savale

Msedcl  

Court Name: Washim

Appelant Advocate R.P.Chavan, P.V.Patil

Respondant Advocate C.S.Potdar

JudgmentFinal OrderComplaint Case No. CC/11/20121. Sukhdeo Bhanu SavaleAt. Bhivari, Tq. Karanja Dist. Washim BEFORE:HON'BLE MRS. Smt. S.M.Untwale PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. A.C.Ukalkar MEMBERHON'BLE MRS. J.G.Khandebharad MEMBER For the Complainant:For the Opp. Party: ORDER ...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 20-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Msedcl in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Msedcl ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Msedcl under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.