MRF
Latest Judgments
Total 170 Consumer Court Cases Against MRF.
REGIONAL MANAGER, MRF LTD. V/S M.L. AGARWAL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4511 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 12/05/2010 in Appeal No. 998/2007 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. M.L. AGARWALRama Towers, 5-4-83, 2nd Floor, TSK Chambers, M.G. RoadSecunderabad - 500003...
Case Number: 4511
|
Date of Filing: 07-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 19-04-2011
MANAGER, MRF LTD. V/S M.L. AGARWAL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4512 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 12/05/2010 in Appeal No. 1021/2007 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. M.L. AGARWALRama Towers, 5-4-83, 2nd Floor, TSK Chambers, M.G. RoadSecunderabad - 50000...
Case Number: 4512
|
Date of Filing: 07-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 19-04-2011
MANAGER, MRF LTD. V/S MANEKLAL AGARWAL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4559 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 12/05/2010 in Appeal No. 1022/2007 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. MANEKLAL AGARWALO/at Rama Towers, 5-4-83, 2nd Floor, TSK Chambers, M.G. RoadSecunderaba...
Case Number: 4559
|
Date of Filing: 13-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 19-04-2011
MANAGER, MRF LTD. V/S M.L. AGARWAL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4560 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 12/05/2010 in Appeal No. 1023/2007 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. M.L. AGARWALO/at Rama Towers, 5-4-83, 2nd Floor, TSK Chambers, M.G. RoadSecunderabad - ...
Case Number: 4560
|
Date of Filing: 13-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 19-04-2011
Arihant Towers, MRF Ltd V/S Vijubhai Chhaganlal Rajgor
Court Name: Kachchh
Appelant Advocate H.C.Chaudhary
Respondant Advocate M.H.Rathod
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 19-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 27-08-2020
MANAGER, MRF LTD. V/S MANEKLAL AGARWAL
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4559 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 12/05/2010 in Appeal No. 1022/2007 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. MANEKLAL AGARWALO/at Rama Towers, 5-4-83, 2nd Floor, TSK Chambers, M.G. RoadSecunderaba...
Case Number: 4559
|
Date of Filing: 13-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2011
MANOJ DIXIT & ANR. V/S MRF LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. K.J. JOHN & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 208 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 18/10/2010 in Appeal No. 316/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MRF LTD.Having its Registered Office at 124, Greams RoadChennai - 600006Tamil Nadu...........
Case Number: 208
|
Date of Filing: 19-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2011
M/s MRF Ltd, Empire Infantry V/S Sri Nanjunda Reddy S/o Anjanappa Reddy
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate M/s S.Chennaraya Reddy, C/Shankar Reddy
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/09/15761. Sri Nanjunda Reddy S/o Anjanappa ReddyR/a No.19, Srivari Layout, Opposite To SBM, Hoodi Village, White...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Simon Parayil V/S MRF Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate R.Narayan
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. A/09/687(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/11/2009 in Case No. CC 78/07 of District Kannur)1. MRF Ltd.Kerala...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Simon ParayilKerala...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT PRESENT: ORDERKERALA STA...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
AMBIKA TYRES SURENDRANGAR , MRF TYRE LIM. AHEMADABAD V/S HARESH BHAI DEVA BHAI CHAVADA
Court Name: Surendranagar
Appelant Advocate K. B. ZALA
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 09-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2020
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against MRF in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against MRF ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against MRF under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.