Mobile
Latest Judgments
Total 9758 Consumer Court Cases Against Mobile.
One-2-one Telecom Mobile Phones V/S Anoop Alex
Court Name: Kasaragod
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGODOLD S.P. OFFICE, PULIKUNNUconsumer case(CC) No. CC/09/56 Anoop Alex ...........Appellant(s)Vs.One-2-one Telecom Mobile Phones ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. K.T.Sidhiq 2. P.P.Shymaladevi 3. P.Ramadevi Complainant(s)/Appella...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/s Mobile Stores V/S Smt.Ravisumam
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
ThiruvananthapuramConsumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Vazhuthacaudconsumer case(CC) No. CC/08/169 Smt.Ravisumam ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Nokia India Pvt Ltd,5th FloorM/s Mobile Stores ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. Smt. Beena Kumari. A 2. Smt. S.K.Sreela 3. Sri G. Sivaprasad ...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 31-07-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Propritor,Noble Mobile sales and servicesMele Bazar,Cherupuzha. V/S Chacko.A.P.
Court Name: Kasaragod
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGODOLD S.P. OFFICE, PULIKUNNUconsumer case(CC) No. CC/09/49 Chacko.A.P. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Propritor,Noble Mobile sales and servicesMele Bazar,Cherupuzha. ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. K.T.Sidhiq 2. P.Ramadevi Complain...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 20-11-2007
|
Date of Upload: 23-08-2020
The Mobile Store, Essar Telecom Retail Ltd., V/S Sunil C.M.
Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional
Appelant Advocate IP
Respondant Advocate S.Manjunath
IInd ADDL. DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.1/7, Swathi Complex, 4th Floor, Seshadripuram, Bangalore-560 020consumer case(CC) No. CC/2716/2008 Sunil C.M. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.The Mobile Store, Essar Telecom Retail Ltd., Salaora International Lim...
Case Number: 2716
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The Mobile Stores V/S Ravi Kumar
Court Name: Bangalore Urban
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSLAL FORUM, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA STATE.Bangalore Urban District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Cauvery Bhavan, 8th Floor, BWSSB Bldg., K. G. Rd., Bangalore-09.consumer case(CC) No. cc/08/2827 Ravi Kumar ...........Appellant(s)V...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 05-01-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Capital Mobile Care Properiter V/S Rajesh Meena
Court Name: Sehore
Appelant Advocate Mr. GD Bairagi
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Raj Mobile Care (Dealer Nokia) V/S Vijendra Sonwane
Court Name: Sehore
Appelant Advocate Mr. GD Bairagi
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 12-08-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The Mobile Stores V/S Ravikumar
Court Name: Bangalore Urban
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM (Principal)8TH FLOOR, CAUVERY BHAVAN, BWSSB BUILDING, BANGALORE-5600 09.Complaint Case No. CC/09/28271. RavikumarNo.23, Ist Floor 3rd Main Society, Colony BangaloreKarnataka...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Mobile StoresEssar Telecom re...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Manager,Twins Mobile V/S Anush K
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
ThiruvananthapuramConsumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Vazhuthacaudconsumer case(CC) No. CC/08/134 Anush K ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Manager,Twins Mobile ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. Smt. Beena Kumari. A 2. Smt. S.K.Sreela 3. Sri G. Sivaprasad Complainant(s)/Appellant(s): O...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 23-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Mobile in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Mobile ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Mobile under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.