company-name-logo

Micromax

Latest Judgments

Total 2291 Consumer Court Cases Against Micromax.

Uttar Pradesh

Micromax Mobile V/S saurabh shukla

Micromax   Mobile  

Court Name: Kanpur Nagar

Appelant Advocate Aditya Kumar

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER FORUM KANPUR NAGARTREASURY COMPOUNDComplaint Case No. CC/65/20161. saurabh shuklaD -665 Vishwa Bank kanpur nagar UP...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Micromax Mobile26/79 karachi khanakanpur nagarup............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MRS. Sudha Yadav PRESIDING MEMBERH...

Case Number: 65

|

Date of Filing: 25-01-2016

|

Date of Upload: 04-03-2017

Chandigarh

Micromax Informatics Ltd. V/S Renu Sen

Micromax  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Rajesh Verma

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application NO. 191 OF 2015in CC/298/2015Renu Sen Vs Micromax Informatics LimitedBEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Devinder Kumar, Counsel for Complainant.Sh.Aman...

Case Number: 191

|

Date of Filing: 28-12-2015

|

Date of Upload: 16-12-2016

Chandigarh

Micromax Informatics V/S Ajay Kumar

Micromax  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application NO. 10 OF 2016in CC/803/2014Ajay Kumar Vs Micromax Informatics and othersBEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Gaurav Bhardwaj, Counsel for Complainant.Sh...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 19-01-2016

|

Date of Upload: 16-12-2016

Haryana

M/S MICROMAX INFORMATICS LTD. V/S RAM KUMAR GUPTA.

Micromax  

Court Name: Panchkula

Appelant Advocate ANURAG GOYAL

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA. Execution Application No.:76 of 2015Date of Institution:15.12.2015Date of Decision:03.03.2016Ram Kumar Gupta s/o Sh.Prem Chand, R/o House No.307, GH 110, Sector-20, Panchkula, Sector-20, Panchkula. ….Compla...

Case Number: 76

|

Date of Filing: 15-12-2015

|

Date of Upload: 08-03-2016

Madhya Pradesh

MICROMAX MOBILE PVT.LTD. V/S ANITA SHARMA W/O LATE M.S. SHARMA

Micromax   Mobile  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1003

|

Date of Filing: 23-09-2015

|

Date of Upload: 02-03-2017

Uttar Pradesh

Micromax Infomatic V/S Bharat Porwal

Micromax  

Court Name: Muradabad-I

Appelant Advocate Mr. Bharat Porwal

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 164

|

Date of Filing: 27-11-2015

|

Date of Upload: 15-03-2016

Chandigarh

Micromax House V/S Inderjit Singh

Micromax  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Rupinder Pal Kaur, Adv. & Narinder Adv.

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 147 OF 2016Inderjit Singh Vs Micromax House and Ors. BEFORE: HON’BLE MR. RAJAN DEWAN PRESIDENT HON’BLE MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU MEMBER HON’BLE MRS. PRITI MALHOTRA MEMBER PRES...

Case Number: 147

|

Date of Filing: 29-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 13-12-2016

Uttarakhand

Micromax Informatics LTD V/S Dayakrishna Sharma

Micromax  

Court Name: Nainital

Appelant Advocate Mr M S Rawat

Respondant Advocate Mr Pooran Joshi

Case Number: 44

|

Date of Filing: 16-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 29-04-2016

Gujarat

MICROMAX INFORMATICS LTD. 1 V/S HARINAGAR GRAHAK SURAKSHA MANDAL 1

Micromax  

Court Name: Vadodara

Appelant Advocate POONAM DESAI

Respondant Advocate A V PATEL

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 03-01-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-03-2016

Karnataka

Micromax Service Centre V/S Ravi Shetti

Micromax  

Court Name: Belgaum

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

(Order dictated by Shri. B.V.Gudli, President): ORDER : The complainant has filed complaint against Opponent U/s. 12 of C.P. Act alleging deficiency in service for non return of Micromax mobile handset. 2) After service of notice opponent No.1 failed to appear before the forum. H...

Case Number: 827

|

Date of Filing: 22-12-2014

|

Date of Upload: 05-03-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Micromax in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Micromax ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Micromax under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.