company-name-logo

Micromax

Latest Judgments

Total 2290 Consumer Court Cases Against Micromax.

Kerala

Micromax V/S Muhammed Shinas H

Micromax  

Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/15/5271. Muhammed Shinas HTC 41/2417,TRA 68,Manacadu,Tvpm...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MicromaxPhase -2,Naraina Industrial Area,New Delhi............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HO...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 04-11-2015

|

Date of Upload: 04-08-2016

Kerala

Micromax V/S Siva Kumar S

Micromax  

Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/15/5311. Siva Kumar STC 14/1421,vigneswara nagar,Vazhuthacadu,Tvpm...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MicromaxNarina indusrial Area,New Delhi............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 06-11-2015

|

Date of Upload: 26-08-2016

Punjab

M/s Micromax India V/S Sumit Heer S/o Shri Kanshi Ram Heer

Micromax  

Court Name: Jalandhar

Appelant Advocate Sh Rakesh Trikha

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/527/20151. Sumit Heer S/o Shri Kanshi Ram Heer R/o 15-L,Nangal Township,District Ropar at present H.No.36,Modern Colony,New ...

Case Number: 527

|

Date of Filing: 15-12-2015

|

Date of Upload: 19-07-2016

Punjab

Micromax Informatics V/S Pargat Singh

Micromax  

Court Name: Sangrur

Appelant Advocate Shri Kali Ram Garg

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR Complaint no. 1397 Instituted on: 26.10.2015 Decided on: 15.07.2016Pargat Singh son of Shri Harbans Singh resident of village Badrukhan, Near Dhira Di Chakki, District Sangrur...

Case Number: 1397

|

Date of Filing: 26-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 22-07-2016

Punjab

Micromax Infomatics Ltd. V/S Dilpreet Singh

Micromax  

Court Name: Sangrur

Appelant Advocate Ritesh Jindal

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 1398 Instituted on: 26.10.2015 Decided on: 13.07.2016Dilpreet Singh son of Gurmail Singh, resident of House No.138, Backside of Basant Hospital, Sunam-148 028 Tehsil Sunam, District Sangrur. …Complainant Ve...

Case Number: 1398

|

Date of Filing: 26-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 18-07-2016

Uttar Pradesh

MICROMAX V/S POOJA AGARWAL

Micromax  

Court Name: Ghaziabad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Execution Application No. EA/16/2016InComplaint Case No. 150/20141. POOJA AGARWALFLAT NO- A-09/103 EBONI PHASE-1, SARA GROUP CRISENT PARK NEAR LAL QUA GHAZIABAD...........Appellant(s)Versus1. MICROMAX MICROMAX HOUSE 90, B GURGAON 122015...........Respondent(s) BEF...

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 17-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 27-07-2016

Punjab

Micromax Informatics Ltd. V/S Lucky

Micromax  

Court Name: Hoshiarpur

Appelant Advocate Sh. Manoj Nagpal

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 11-04-2016

|

Date of Upload: 29-11-2016

Kerala

Micromax India V/S Sunil.V.V

Micromax  

Court Name: Kannur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 395

|

Date of Filing: 19-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 20-07-2016

Rajasthan

MICROMAX V/S DRASHTI GOYAL

Micromax  

Court Name: Jaipur-II

Appelant Advocate P.S.Tomar

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 655

|

Date of Filing: 21-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 14-07-2016

Rajasthan

Micromax and other V/S Dungar dat ranga

Micromax  

Court Name: Bikaner

Appelant Advocate Trilochan sharma

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 158

|

Date of Filing: 05-04-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-07-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Micromax in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Micromax ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Micromax under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.