Case Number: 642
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 02-10-2018
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Mannu Malik
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 122
|
Date of Filing: 04-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 25-09-2017
Court Name: Jind
Appelant Advocate Inperson
Respondant Advocate Sh. Anil Kumar Sheokand
Case Number: 115
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-09-2017
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Sh. Tarun Goyal
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRURJUDICIAL COURT COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR, SANGRUR (148001)PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/173/20171. Vikas GoyalVikas Goyal S/o NAnu Ram R/o Ward no. 1, Grid colony, Moonak, Tehsil Moonak, Distt. Sangrur...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Xia...
Case Number: 173
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2017
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Mannu Malik
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 185
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-06-2017
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Dated :28/04/2017ORDER Sh. Vikas Kundu, counsel for the complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file fresh. In view of the above, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would ...
Case Number: 370
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-05-2017
Court Name: Panch Mahals
Appelant Advocate A S THAKKAR
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-05-2017
Court Name: Amritsar
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Brahmi
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabExecution Application No. EA/17/14InComplaint Case No. CC/16/3071. Jodha RamDistrict Courts, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Appellant(s)Versus1. MI Exclusive Service CentreB...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2017
Court Name: Visakhapatnam
Appelant Advocate D.SATYA SUMA
Respondant Advocate ABSENT
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 02-05-2017
Court Name: Aurangabad
Appelant Advocate self
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 31-03-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Mi in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Mi ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Mi under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.