Mescom
Latest Judgments
Total 201 Consumer Court Cases Against Mescom.
P.S. SURYANARAYANA BHAT & ANR. V/S EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MESCOM (FORMERLY KPTCL) & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. H. CHANDRA SEKHAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 70 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 11/04/2005 in Appeal No. 1499/2003 of the State Commission Karnataka) WITH IA/134/2013,IA/135/20131. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MESCOM (FORMERLY KPTCL) & ANR.ATTAVAR MANAGA...
Case Number: 70
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 18-02-2013
Case Number: 286
|
Date of Filing: 20-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 23-09-2020
Executive Engineer, MESCOM V/S Rajesh Pereira
Court Name: Udupi
Appelant Advocate Sri Sunil S.M
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 87
|
Date of Filing: 30-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 19-01-2019
SRI KRISHNA POOJARY AND ANR. V/S SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (ELEC) MESCOM
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DEVASHISH BHARUKA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2312 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 21/03/2006 in Appeal No. 1096/2006 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (ELEC) MESCOMO & M CIRECLE ATTAVARA MANGALORE KARNATAKA2. EXECUTIVE...
Case Number: 2312
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2007
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2011
The Executive Engineer, Mescom V/S Melville Pinto
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate JMS
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/317/2010( Date of Filing : 10 Nov 2010 )1. Melville PintoJanadhwani, Mangalore...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Executive Engineer, MescomMangalore............Opp.Party(s) B...
Case Number: 317
|
Date of Filing: 10-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 12-03-2019
Assistant Executive Engineer, MESCOM V/S Dasharatha Gowda
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate Sanjay D
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/243/2010( Date of Filing : 07 Sep 2010 )1. Dasharatha GowdaSo. Sannanna Gowda, Aged about 80 years, RA. Mallar House, Madhuvan, Enekallu, Sullia Takluk, Dakshina Kannada...........
Case Number: 243
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2019
Station Officer, MESCOM V/S Mr.H. Rajendra Nayak
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate K.N. Bhat
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/237/2010( Date of Filing : 27 Aug 2010 )1. Mr.H. Rajendra NayakSo. H.Keshava Nayak, Sharada School Lane, Kodialbail, Mangalore 575 003............Complainant(s)Versus1. Station ...
Case Number: 237
|
Date of Filing: 27-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2019
The Assistant Executive Engineer, The office of Assistant Executive Engineer, MESCOM V/S Mr.Somappa Gowda
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate CNG
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/215/2010( Date of Filing : 03 Aug 2010 )1. Mr.Somappa GowdaSo. Kukkappa Gowda, Aged about 80 years, Rep. by his G.P.A. holder his son Purushothama M, Aged about 37 years, RA. Me...
Case Number: 215
|
Date of Filing: 03-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2019
Executive Engineer, MESCOM V/S Mr.K. Mohammed
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate Leelavathi A. Bollar
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/201/2010( Date of Filing : 15 Jul 2010 )1. Mr.K. MohammedAged about 77 years, So. Ismail, RA. Kumpana Majalu, Farangipete, Bantwal Taluk...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Executi...
Case Number: 201
|
Date of Filing: 15-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2019
Assistant Executive Engineer, MESCOM V/S Sri.P.Krishnamoorthy
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate Sanjay D
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/171/2010( Date of Filing : 08 Jun 2010 )1. Sri.P.KrishnamoorthySo. A. Sundara Karanth, Aged about 46 years, RA. Urlandy, Bypass Road, Puttur Taluk, Dakshina Kannada............C...
Case Number: 171
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 12-02-2019
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Mescom in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Mescom ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Mescom under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.