Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate S.Reghu Kumar
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSALCOMMISSION, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMC.C. NO.35/2010JUDGMENT DATED29/02/2016PRESENT:SMT. A. RADHA : MEMBERSMT. SANTHAMMA THOMAS : MEMBERCOMPLAINANT: Mohammad Nowfal, S/o. Sri. Abdul Salam,Pattathil, Ayathil P.O., Kollam, Kerala.(By...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 15-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Abhinashi Singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. S.S.Bawa, Adv. for OP no. 1.Sh. Rajesh Verma, Adv. for OP NO. 2
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHComplaint Case No.30 of 2013Date of Institution10.05.2013Date of Decision21.07.2015Manjit Singh Khaira S/o S.Kartar Singh r/o House No.4, Sector 8-A, Chandigarh. ….. Complainant. VersusMercedes &nda...
Case Number: 30
|
Date of Filing: 10-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2015
Court Name: Aurangabad
Appelant Advocate Adv- A.M. Mamidwar
Respondant Advocate
जिल्‍हा ग्राहक तक्रार निवारण मंच, औरंगाबाद________________________________________________________________________________________________ग्राहक तक्रार क्रमांक :-3/2011...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 12-03-2015
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate GEORGE CHERIAN
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/11/7251. AKBAR BADHSHAS/O P.M MUHAMMED, PLCO PACK PVT. LTD, 13/569, K.C ROAD, CHULLIKAL, COCHIN 5...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S MERCEDES-BENZ INDIA PVT. LTDE-3, MIDC CHAKAN, PHASE 3, CHAKAN INDUSTRI...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY KR. PATHAK & M.S. PANDIT
Respondant Advocate MR. DHRUV MADAN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 100 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 02/02/2004 in Complaint No. 39/2004 of the State Commission Delhi)1. MERCEDES-BENZ INDIA PROVATE LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DAIMLERCHRYSLER INDIA PVT. LTD.)E-3, MIDC Chakan ...
Case Number: 100
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2009
|
Date of Upload: 12-06-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJAY KR. PATHAK & M.S. PANDIT
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 36 OF 2013 IN FA/100/20091. MERCEDES-BENZ INDIA PROVATE LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DAIMLERCHRYSLER INDIA PVT. LTD.) & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. INTERCARD (INDIA) LTD............Respond...
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 21-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 25-03-2013
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. M.Papa Reddy
Respondant Advocate M/s. A.P.Venugopal
Complaint Case No. CC/21/20101. Mohd. Hyder Khan, son of Sri Gulam Hyder KhanR/o.8-2-293/82/J-III, 504, Road No.86, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad -500 033. Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. Mercedes-Benz India Private Limited E-3, MIDC Chakan -Phase -III, C...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 25-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. M.Papa Reddy
Respondant Advocate M/s. A.P.Venugopal
Complaint Case No. CC/21/20101. Mohd. Hyder Khan, son of Sri Gulam Hyder KhanR/o.8-2-293/82/J-III, 504, Road No.86, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad -500 033. Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. Mercedes-Benz India Private Limited E-3, MIDC Chakan -Phase -III, C...
Case Number: 21
|
Date of Filing: 25-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. M.S. PANDIT, VINEET MAHESHWARI & SANDEEP SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. ABHIJEET SINHA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 364 OF 2012 IN FA/217/20091. MERCEDES-BENZ INDIA PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S. DAIMLERCHRYSLER INDIA PVT. LTD.)...........Appellants(s)Versus1. NATWARLAL M BADIANI & ORS............Respond...
Case Number: 364
|
Date of Filing: 31-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 19-07-2012
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate RAJESH VIJAYENDRAN
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/10/6671. SRI PRAMESH.K.DH.NO 34/678A, KALAVAMPARA HOUSE, MAMANGALAM, PALARIVATTOM POST. COCHIN, KERALA,...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S MERCEDES-BENZ INDIA PRIVATE LIMITEDE-3 MIDC,CHAKAN, PHASEIII, CHAKAN INDUSTRIAL AREA, KURULI& NIGHOJE. TAL:KHED, PUNE...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Mercedes-benz in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Mercedes-benz ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Mercedes-benz under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.