Meerut Development Authority Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate B P Dubey
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 2004
|
Date of Filing: 31-01-2004
|
Date of Upload: 11-09-2024
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Piyush Mani Tripathi & Ram Raj
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1014/2024( Date of Filing : 16 Jul 2024 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/12/2023 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/66/2017 of District Meerut)1. Mee...
Case Number: 1014
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2024
|
Date of Upload: 25-07-2024
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RACHIT MITTAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1578 OF 2022(Against the Order dated 11/07/2013 in Appeal No. 855/2005 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MDA)...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. KAMAL ...........Respo...
Case Number: 1578
|
Date of Filing: 28-11-2022
|
Date of Upload: 26-04-2024
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sushil Kumar Sharma
Respondant Advocate Ram Raj & Piyush Mani Tripathi
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/647/2021( Date of Filing : 15 Dec 2021 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/02/2018 in Case No. Complaint Case No. C/2014/86 of District Meerut)1. Rames...
Case Number: 647
|
Date of Filing: 15-12-2021
|
Date of Upload: 09-04-2024
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate Naveen Srivastava
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 282
|
Date of Filing: 12-05-2022
|
Date of Upload: 11-03-2024
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate MR. RACHIT MITTAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 4 OF 2023(Against the Order dated 07/10/2022 in Complaint No. 100/2015 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. NIRMALA JAINW/O SH. MAMCHAND JAIN, R/O D-1/5, MODEL TOWN, DELHI-110006...........Appellant(s)V...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2023
|
Date of Upload: 14-02-2024
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate None
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 28-06-2021
|
Date of Upload: 01-01-2024
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate MR. RACHIT MITTAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3191 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 07/05/2014 in Appeal No. 1172/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SUDARSHAN KUMARS/O. SH. JODHA RAM, R/O. 1002/7, TOTA BUILDING, MEHRAULI,NEW DELHI..........
Case Number: 3191
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-12-2023
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SAMEER KULSHRESHTA
Respondant Advocate MR. RACHIT MITTAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 395 OF 2020(Against the Order dated 01/09/2017 in Appeal No. 2487/2015 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. NISHA SINGHALW/O. SH.SINGHAL, R/O2/1 GANDHI NAGAR, DISTRICT : GHAZIABADUTTAR PRADESH........
Case Number: 395
|
Date of Filing: 04-03-2020
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2023
Development Authority Meerut Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. A.K. TEWARI & MR. DEEPAYAN MANDAL
Respondant Advocate MR. RACHIT MITTAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 335 OF 20021. ARMY WELFARE HOUSING ORGANISATIONHEAD OFFICE AT SOUTH HUTMENTS KASHMIR HOUSE RAJAJI MARG NEW DELHI - 110 011 THROUGH MAJ. GEN. M.M.L. SHA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MEERUT DEVELOPMENT A...
Case Number: 335
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2002
|
Date of Upload: 06-11-2023
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Meerut Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Meerut Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Meerut Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.