Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. Gouri Sankara Rao
Respondant Advocate M/s.C.Balagopal - OP's 1 and 2
BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. CC/2012/78(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Dr. Akella Satha Vijay Sarma S/o Late A.S.R. Murthy, Aged about 59 years, indian,Occ: Medical Practitioner,R/o...
Case Number: 2012
|
Date of Filing: 14-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. Gouri Sankara Rao
Respondant Advocate M/s.C.Balagopal - OP's 1 and 2
BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. CC/2012/78(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Dr. Akella Satha Vijay Sarma S/o Late A.S.R. Murthy, Aged about 59 years, indian,Occ: Medical Practitioner,R/o...
Case Number: 2012
|
Date of Filing: 14-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bankura
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 32
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2014
|
Date of Upload: 23-12-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MRS. K. RADHA & MR. K. MARUTHI RAO
Respondant Advocate MR. PARNAM PRABHAKAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2002 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 13/02/2013 in Appeal No. 154/2012 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh) WITH IA/3303/20131. CHAIRMAN FAMILY BENEFIT SCHEME INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONAP STATE BRA...
Case Number: 2002
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-01-2014
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate MR. MOHAN RAO
Respondant Advocate Mr.M.Chalapathi Rao - OP 1 to 4
BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADComplaint Case No. CC/29/20121. 1. B.G. SREEDEVI, W/O LATE DR. B.G. SREEDHAR, AGED 40 YEARS,R/O H.NO. 51/15A-121-1, BABA BRINDAVAN NAGAR, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DIST.2. 2. B.G. RITEESH RAMA CHANDRA, S/O LATE ...
Case Number: 29
|
Date of Filing: 30-01-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: South Goa
Appelant Advocate Suresh K. Raikar
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,SOUTH GOAMARGAO-GOAComplaint Case No. CC/13/781. Suresh K. RaikarKamakshi Vihar,145, G-1, Fatima Colony,Alto,Dabolim Goa...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Salgaonkar Medical Research Center & anotherNear Vegetable Market, Vasco...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 31-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P. VENKAT REDDY & MR. B. RAMANA MURTHY
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 25 OF 2014 IN FA/191/20131. K. SANJEEV KUMAR @ KAMMA SANJEEVA RAO...........Appellants(s)Versus1. KRISHNA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (KIMS) & 2 ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'...
Case Number: 25
|
Date of Filing: 09-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate DR. R.S. CHAURASIA
Respondant Advocate MR. B.L. SAINI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 396 OF 2013 IN FA/445/20071. SMT. USHENDRA W/O. (L)SH.RAJKUMAR& 2 OTRS...........Appellants(s)Versus1. DR.BARENDRA PAL SINGH, MEDICAL OFFICER & 2 ORS...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BL...
Case Number: 396
|
Date of Filing: 24-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 22-01-2014
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate K.K. Vijayakumaran
Respondant Advocate P. Bhaskaran
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAYYANTHOLETHRISSUR-3Complaint Case No. CC/06/10961. LathaW/o. Jayaprakash, Changarathparambil House, Killimangalam, Talappilly Taluk. BEFORE:HONORABLE Padmini Sudheesh PRESIDENT SHEENA V V MEMBER M P Chandrakumar MEMBER For the Complainant:K.K. Vi...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Purba Midnapur
Appelant Advocate Himanshue Sekhar Samanta
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPURBA MEDINIPURABASBARI, P.O. TAMLUK, DIST. PURBA MEDINIPUR,PIN. 721636TELEFAX. 03228270317Complaint Case No. CC/66/20131. Sri Mithilesh Singh, S.o Paras SinghVill. Padumbasan Jal Khana More P.O. & P.S. Tamluk, Dist. Purba MedinipurPurba ...
Case Number: 66
|
Date of Filing: 03-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2015
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Medical in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Medical ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Medical under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.