company-name-logo

Medical

Latest Judgments

Total 3798 Consumer Court Cases Against Medical.

Gujarat

UNITED MEDICAL SERVICES V/S RAJ PETHOLOGY LAB.

Medical  

Court Name: Panch Mahals

Appelant Advocate S P MEHTA

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 05-05-2017

|

Date of Upload: 02-04-2019

West Bengal

The Director, Apex Institute of Medical Science. V/S Smt. Papia Banerjee.

Medical   Institute  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. H. Brahmachari

Respondant Advocate Mr. Abhik Kr. Das

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087Execution Application No. EA/12/2014( Date of Filing : 29 Sep 2014 )InComplaint Case No. CC/65/20101. Smt. Papia Banerjee.W/o. Late Niloy Banerjee, A-139, Lake Gardens, Kolkata - 700 ...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 29-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 27-03-2019

Karnataka

The Managing Director Medical Director V/S Smt. Shilpa K. W/o K. Nagaraju

Medical  

Court Name: Raichur

Appelant Advocate Krishna Bhat

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 02-03-2019

|

Date of Upload: 27-03-2020

Punjab

Punjab Institute of Medical Sciences V/S Gurdial Singh S/o Sh Lachmann Singh

Medical   Institute  

Court Name: Jalandhar

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Execution Application No. EA/7/2019( Date of Filing : 12 Feb 2019 )InComplaint Case No. CC/149/20171. Gurdial Singh S/o Sh Lachmann SinghR/o 309/1...

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 12-02-2019

|

Date of Upload: 22-03-2019

Haryana

FRANK INSTT. OF MEDICAL SCIENCES V/S RAVI GUPTA

Medical  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate VIKAS DEEP

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, Panchkula First Appeal No.599 of 2017 Date of Institution: 17.05.2017Date of Decision: 19.03.2019Sh.Ravi Gupta, S/o Sh.Ram Niwas Gupta, R/o Rohtak Road,Sonepat.…..AppellantVersus1. Frank Instt. of Medical Science...

Case Number: 599

|

Date of Filing: 17-05-2017

|

Date of Upload: 15-04-2019

Haryana

BPL Medical Technologies Pvt. V/S Dr.Parveen Garg

Medical   Bpl  

Court Name: Kaithal

Appelant Advocate Sh.Dinesh Tyagi

Respondant Advocate Sh.Mukesh Sharma

DCDRFKAITHALComplaint Case No. 35/18( Date of Filing : 18 Jan 2018 )1. Dr.Parveen Garg Kaithal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. BPL Medical Technologies Pvt.Bengluru............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. D.N Arora PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. Rajbir Singh MEMBER For the Complainant:...

Case Number: 35

|

Date of Filing: 18-01-2018

|

Date of Upload: 26-03-2019

Madhya Pradesh

CHIEF MEDICAL & HEALTH OFFICER AND OTHER V/S MRS RAJ RANI SAUR

Medical  

Court Name: Panna

Appelant Advocate BALA PRASAD BAJPAYEE

Respondant Advocate R.K.NIGAM & OTHERS

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 09-02-2017

|

Date of Upload: 26-08-2022

Madhya Pradesh

CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER AND OTHER V/S MRS KAMLESH BAI VERMAN

Medical  

Court Name: Panna

Appelant Advocate BALA PRASAD BAJPAYEE

Respondant Advocate R.K.NIGAM, DINESH MISHRA, M.L.AWASTHI

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 09-03-2017

|

Date of Upload: 26-08-2022

Delhi

SMT. KUSUM AND ANR. V/S MEDICAL OFFICER INCHARGE AND OTHERS

Medical  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision:18.03.2019 First Appeal - 170/2009(Arising out of the order dated 16.12.2008 passed in Complainant Case No.234/2007 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum ...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 05-03-2009

|

Date of Upload: 25-03-2019

Uttarakhand

Narayan Swami institute of Medical Science&research V/S Faisal Ahmad Khan

Medical   Institute  

Court Name: Dehradun

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 153

|

Date of Filing: 05-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 18-03-2019

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Medical in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Medical ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Medical under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.