company-name-logo

Max

Latest Judgments

Total 4068 Consumer Court Cases Against Max.

Gujarat

MANAGER MAX NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. V/S JAGABHAI JETHABHAI VANKAR

Life Insurance   Life Insurance   Max  

Court Name: Mahesana

Appelant Advocate K.G.PARMAR

Respondant Advocate D.L.TRIVEDI

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 27-08-2010

|

Date of Upload: 21-02-2021

Telangana

1.The Manager , MAX newyork life inurance..2. V/S K.Komalatha

Max  

Court Name: Karimnagar

Appelant Advocate T. Venugopal ,adv

Respondant Advocate Exparte

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 02-08-2010

|

Date of Upload: 27-09-2019

Chandigarh

Max New York Life Insurance V/S Dinesh KUmar

Life Insurance   Life Insurance   Max  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 64 of 2012 1. Dinesh KUmarR/o HOuse No. 2 Village Dhanas UT Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Max New York Life InsuranceSCO 40-41 SEctor-8 Madhya Marg UT Chandigarh ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : ...

Case Number: 64

|

Date of Filing: 30-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Gujarat

Max Newyork Life Insurence Company Limited V/S Shree Govindbhai Vasrambhai Dudhaya

Max  

Court Name: Rajkot Addl

Appelant Advocate R V Sakaria

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 2011

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 15-08-2020

Maharashtra

Max Newyark Life Insurance Co.Ltd V/S Yash constraction and Land Devolpement Through Shri Sanjay namdeo Shimde

Life Insurance   Life Insurance   Max  

Court Name: Nashik

Appelant Advocate Smt. vaishali Gupte

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/217/20111. Yash constraction and Land Devolpement Through Shri Sanjay namdeo ShimdeR/o Plot No 38,Anandvijay sankul,C-wing,Jail Rd.Nashik Rd Nashik 422101NashikMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Max Newyark Life Insurance Co.LtdUnit No.201, 2nd flo...

Case Number: 217

|

Date of Filing: 23-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

MAX LIFE INSURANCE V/S HAMANT KASYAP

Max Life Insurance   Life Insurance   Max  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 563

|

Date of Filing: 27-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 10-02-2016

Gujarat

Max Newyork Life Insurance V/S Ushaben Gedia

Life Insurance   Life Insurance   Max  

Court Name: Rajkot

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 22-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 12-03-2020

Kerala

PROPRIETOR,THE MAX V/S K SADASIVAN

Max  

Court Name: Kozhikode

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CC NO. 490 Of 20111. K SADASIVANKAUSTHUBHAM,VENGHERI PO,673010KOZHIKODE...........Complainant(s)Versus1. PROPRIETOR,THE MAXS M STREETKOZHIKODE............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONOURABLE MR. G Yadunadhan, BA.,LLB., PRESIDENTHONOURABLE MRS. Jayasree Kallat, MA., MemberHONOURABLE MR....

Case Number: 490

|

Date of Filing: 08-12-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

Max New York Life Insurance Co. Ltd. V/S Gursatpal Kaur

Life Insurance   Life Insurance   Max  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sh.R.P.Singh, Adv. for the appellant

Respondant Advocate Sh.Rajneesh Malhotra, Adv.

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 276 of 2011 1. Gursatpal KaurW/o Late Sh. Nardev Singh, R/o H.No. 612, Mian Road, Kalka, District Panchkula ...........Appellant(...

Case Number: 276

|

Date of Filing: 10-10-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Kerala

Max Newyork Insurance Co LTD and 2 others V/S Thomas Stephen

Max  

Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/11/2131. Thomas StephenCKRRA 170, Mosque Lane, PettahTVM...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Max Newyork Insurance Co LTD and 2 others90A, Section 18, Udyog ViharGurgaon2. The Branch Manager, Max New York Life InsuranceOPP Holy Angels ConventTVM3. Mrs Jesy LAge...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 21-06-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Max in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Max ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Max under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.