Max
Latest Judgments
Total 4068 Consumer Court Cases Against Max.
MAX NEW YORK LIFE INSU , MAHESHBHAI V.PARMAR V/S VANKAR RAMESHBHAI VENABHAI
Court Name: Sabar kantha
Appelant Advocate P.Y.JOSHI
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 23-08-2020
Micro Max Inmomatics V/S Bhavesh R Sitapara
Court Name: Rajkot Addl
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate B N Daftari
Case Number: 2012
|
Date of Filing: 19-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 24-07-2020
KALURAM DUBEY V/S MAX NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PIYUSH SINGHAL
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2808 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 16/03/2011 in Appeal No. 338/2010 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. MAX NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.11th and 12th Floor DLF Square Building, Jaca...
Case Number: 2808
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 12-03-2013
M/s MAX INDIA LIMITED & 2 ORS., V/S Mr. ATUL MADAN
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SAMEER JAIN & MR. SANDEEP BAJAJ,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 40 OF 20131. Mr. ATUL MADANR/o D-404, Parsvavnath Prestige, Sector 93-A,NOIDA - 201304............Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s MAX INDIA LIMITED & 2 ORS.,1, Dr. Jha Marg, Okhla Phase-III,NEW DELHI - 110020.2...
Case Number: 40
|
Date of Filing: 20-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2013
MAX NEWYORK LIFE INSU V/S SARTANBHAI FULABHAI VANJARA
Court Name: Sabar kantha
Appelant Advocate M.P.RAMI
Respondant Advocate V.M.DOSHI
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 23-08-2020
MAX NEWYORK LIFE INSU V/S PINABEN DILIPBHAI SOMPURA
Court Name: Sabar kantha
Appelant Advocate M.P.RAMI
Respondant Advocate V.M.DOSHI
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 29-09-2016
MAX SUPER SPECIALITY HOSPITAL & 3 ORS. V/S SANTOSH KUMAR GUPTA
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MADHURENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 680 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 11/01/2012 in Complaint No. 44/2009 of the State Commission Delhi)1. SANTOSH KUMAR GUPTASON OF LATE SHRI B.P. SHARMA, R/O. SHUKHLANAPURA,DISTRICT-MAHOBAU.P...........Appe...
Case Number: 680
|
Date of Filing: 02-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 04-03-2013
M/S. MAX NEW YORK LIFE & 3 ORS. V/S RAJESH THAKUR
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMIT SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 37 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 21/11/2012 in Complaint No. 21/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. RAJESH THAKURS/O. SHRI S.N. THAKUR, R/O. H NO. 2273, SECTOR-9, FARIDABADHARYANA...........Appellant(...
Case Number: 37
|
Date of Filing: 11-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-02-2013
Manager, Max New York Life Insurance Company, V/S Jeni Rajan,
Life Insurance Life Insurance Max
Court Name: Kannur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,KANNURComplaint Case No. CC/80/20111. Jeni Rajan, Devi Kripa, Thazhe Namath, PO Chokli, Thalassery, Kannur Kerala ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Manager, Max New York Life Insurance Company, Max House, III Floor, 1 Dr. Jha Marg, Okhla, ...
Case Number: 80
|
Date of Filing: 05-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Manager , Max New York Life Insurance Co. , V/S Maikayil Shajumon,
Life Insurance Life Insurance Max
Court Name: Kannur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,KANNURComplaint Case No. CC/81/20111. Maikayil Shajumon,Sarovaram, Kottam, PO Mundaloor, Kannur Kerala ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Manager , Max New York Life Insurance Co. , Max House, III Floor, 1 Dr. Jha Marg, Okhla, New Delhi 110...
Case Number: 81
|
Date of Filing: 05-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Max in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Max ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Max under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.