Court Name: Palakkad
Appelant Advocate B. Ravikumar
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/74/20131. V.M. Nazar228(1169) Karayankkad, House, Vadakkenchery P.O.,PalakkadKerala ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s. Max New York Life Insurance Co. LtdOperation Centre, 90-A, Udyog Vihar, Sector 18, Pin - 122015 Gurgaon Hariyana2. M/s. Max NewYork Lif...
Case Number: 74
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhopal
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 23-09-2020
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. HITENDER KANSAL, MR. CHETAN GUPTA & MR. SUNIL JAIN
Respondant Advocate M/S. JS LAW CHAMBERS
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 854 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 05/10/2012 in Appeal No. 830/2012 of the State Commission Haryana) WITH IA/1533/20131. SUNITA & 2 ORS.HOUSE NO. 5071/72/73, TIN WALI GALI, KASERA BAZAR,AMBALA CANTT...
Case Number: 854
|
Date of Filing: 04-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 19-02-2014
Court Name: Kottayam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, KottayamComplaint Case No. CC/236/20121. FRANCIS SALESCHURAPUZHA,KODADOOR P.O,KOTTAYAM-686564...........Complainant(s)Versus1. VANITHA MAXMALAYALA MANORAMA,KOTTAYAM-6860022. EVERGREEN AGENCIESPANAMPALLY NAGAR,COCHIN-682036............Opp.Party(s...
Case Number: 236
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Max Life Insurance Life Insurance Life Insurance Max
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajneesh Malhotra Adv.
Respondant Advocate Vishal Bali, Adv.
First Appeal No. FA/516/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. MAx Life Insurance Co.LimitedChd............Appellant(s)Versus1. Amarjeet Singh Randhawas/o Sh. Harbans Singh Randhawa R/o House No. 82, Sector-27/A, Chandigarh...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:...
Case Number: 516
|
Date of Filing: 04-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Max Life Insurance Life Insurance Life Insurance Max
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajneesh Malhotra Adv.
Respondant Advocate Vishal Bali, Adv.
First Appeal No. FA/517/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Max Life Insurance Co.LimitedChd............Appellant(s)Versus1. Amarjeet Singh RandhawaS/o Sh. Harbans Singh Randhawa, R/o House No. 82, Sector-27-A, Chandigarh...........Respondent(s) BEFORE...
Case Number: 517
|
Date of Filing: 04-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. JS LAW CHAMBERS
Respondant Advocate M/S. NULI & NULI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 610 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 30/05/2011 in Appeal No. 1198/2011 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. MAX NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD.11th & 12th Floor, DLF Square Building, Jacaranda Marg, D...
Case Number: 610
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 04-03-2014
Court Name: Ahmedabad Addl
Appelant Advocate PATHIK M. ACHARYA
Respondant Advocate B S RAIYANI
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 14-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 29-11-2019
Life Insurance Life Insurance Max
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. RajneeshMalhotra Adv.
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/32/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. M/s Max New York Life InsuranceChd. BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ MEMBERHON'ABLE MRS. PADMA PANDEY MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERAs per the Office report, the rec...
Case Number: 32
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Life Insurance Life Insurance Max
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajneesh Malhotra Adv.
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/33/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. Max New York Life InsuranceChd. BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. DEV RAJ MEMBERHON'ABLE MRS. PADMA PANDEY MEMBER PRESENT: ORDER      &...
Case Number: 33
|
Date of Filing: 22-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Max in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Max ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Max under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.