company-name-logo

Max

Latest Judgments

Total 4068 Consumer Court Cases Against Max.

NCDRC

HAR BAI V/S MAX NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD.

Life Insurance   Life Insurance   Max  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. JS LAW CHAMBERS

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2398 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 03/02/2014 in Appeal No. 1217/2013 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. MAX NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD.REGISTERED OFFICE AT: MAX HOUSE,1 DR.JHA MARG, OKHLA, NE...

Case Number: 2398

|

Date of Filing: 29-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 07-11-2014

Punjab

Max New York life Ins. co. ltd V/S Kuljit kaur

Max  

Court Name: Bhatinda

Appelant Advocate Navdeep Jeeda

Respondant Advocate

Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/14/3501. Kuljit kaurson of chamkaur singh r/o village PoohliBathidna...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Max New York life Ins. co....

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 02-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

Max New York Life Insurance, V/S Singireddy Srinivas Reddy, s/o Singi Reddy Ramreddy, aged 35 years, Occ Business.

Max  

Court Name: Nizamabad

Appelant Advocate Sri J Venkatesh war

Respondant Advocate Sri Ch. Sailoo

causetitlejudgement entryComplaint Case No. CC/45/20121. Singireddy Srinivas Reddy, s/o Singi Reddy Ramreddy, aged 35 years, Occ Business.H.No:6-15-98/2, Sanjeevayya Colony, Pavan Nagar, NizamabadNizamabadAndhra Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Max New York Life Insurance...

Case Number: 45

|

Date of Filing: 16-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

Max New York Life Insurance. V/S Singireddy Srinivas Reddy, s/o Singi Reddy Ramreddy, aged 35 years, Occ Business

Max  

Court Name: Nizamabad

Appelant Advocate Sri J. Venkateshwar

Respondant Advocate Sri Ch. Sailoo

causetitlejudgement entryComplaint Case No. CC/46/20121. Singireddy Srinivas Reddy, s/o Singi Reddy Ramreddy, aged 35 years, Occ BusinessH.No:6-15-98/2, Sanjeevayya colony, Pavan nagar, NizamabadNizamabadAndhra Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Max New York Life Insurance....

Case Number: 46

|

Date of Filing: 16-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Telangana

Max New York Life Insurance. V/S Singireddy Srinivas Reddy, s/o Singi Reddy Ramreddy, aged 35 years, Occ Business.

Max  

Court Name: Nizamabad

Appelant Advocate Sri J. Venkateshwar

Respondant Advocate Sri Ch. Sailoo

causetitlejudgement entryComplaint Case No. CC/47/20121. Singireddy Srinivas Reddy, s/o Singi Reddy Ramreddy, aged 35 years, Occ Business.H.No:6-15-98/2, Sanjeevayya Colony, Pavan Nagar, Nizamabad.NizamabadAndhra Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Max New York Life Insuranc...

Case Number: 47

|

Date of Filing: 16-07-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Jharkhand

The Branch Manager , Max New York Life Insurance Company Ltd V/S Rajendra Rai

Life Insurance   Life Insurance   Max  

Court Name: Purbi Singhbhum

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/69/2012( Date of Filing : 18 Jun 2012 )1. Rajendra Rai R/o - Namotola , Sundernagar , P.O & P.S Sundernagar , Jamshedpur Purbi SinghbhumJharkhand...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Branch Manager , Max New York Life Insurance Company LtdBra...

Case Number: 69

|

Date of Filing: 18-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 09-11-2019

Karnataka

The Manager, Max Life Insurance Co.Ltd., Gurgaon V/S Smt. Shankramma W/o: Late Rudrappa, R/o: Godinal, Tq: Gangavathi.

Max Life Insurance   Life Insurance   Life Insurance   Max  

Court Name: Koppal

Appelant Advocate Sri.M V Mudgal Adv

Respondant Advocate Sri.S.S.Patil Adv

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMOLD CIVIL COURT BUILDING, JAWAHAR ROAD, KOPPALComplaint Case No. CC/14/151. Smt. Shankramma W/o: Late Rudrappa, R/o: Godinal, Tq: Gangavathi.Age: 30 Years, Occ: Household, R/o: Godinal, Tq: Gangavathi, Dist: KoppalKoppalKarnata...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 19-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

West Bengal

Sri Ashis Agarwal, Agent of M/s. Max Bupa Health Insurance Co. Ltd. and 3 others V/S Sri Barun Goswami

Health Insurance   Health Insurance   Max Bupa Health Insurance   Max  

Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Unit-1, Kolkata8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site : confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/14/4431. Barun Goswami18A, R.N. Das ROad, Dhakuria, 1st Floor, Kolkata-700031............Complainant(s)Versus1. Ashis Agarwal, Ma...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 27-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

MAX SUPER SPECIALTY HOSPITAL & 4 ORS. V/S M. K. CHOWDHURY

Hospital   Max  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ASIT KUMAR ROY,

Respondant Advocate M/S. LEX PRO

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 189 OF 20141. Shri M. K. CHOWDHURY,R/o B-2, South Ganesh Nagar,DELHI - 110092............Complainant(s)Versus1. MAX SUPER SPECIALTY HOSPITAL & 4 ORS.,Through its Chairman/CEO, 2, Press Enclave Road, Saket,...

Case Number: 189

|

Date of Filing: 16-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 15-10-2014

Circuit Bench Nagpur

Smt Krishna Amit Ghosh V/S Max New york life Insurance co ltd

Life Insurance   Life Insurance   Max  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Ad Vijay Brahme

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONMAHARASHTRA NAGPUR CIRCUIT BENCHNAGPURFirst Appeal No. FA/12/50(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/09/2011 in Case No. cc/10/282 of District Nagpur)1. Max New york life Insurance co ltd12th floor , DLF Square,JACARANDA Marg,DLF City Phase 2,G...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 21-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Max in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Max ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Max under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.