Max
Latest Judgments
Total 4068 Consumer Court Cases Against Max.
Max New York life Ins.Co V/S Ganga Dass joshi
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate R.P.Singh
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/15/1081. Ganga Dass joshison of Sadhu Ram r/o Sunam Near Model Basic school Ram nagar Sunam district Sangruru 2. Bimla joshi w/o...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 08-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 11-05-2015
Micro Max Informatics Lt. V/S Saikat Das
Court Name: Hooghly
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, HOOGHLYCC OF 2013PETITIONERVERSOPPOComplaint Case No. CC/224/20141. Saikat DasChinsurah, Hooghly...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Micro Max Informatics Lt.Delhi............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri S.K. Das PRESIDENTHO...
Case Number: 224
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2015
MANAGER, M/s. MAX BUPA HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY LTD V/S V.K CHERIAN
Health Insurance Health Insurance Max Bupa Health Insurance Max
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate TOM JOSEPH
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 28-05-2015
MD, MAX AUTOS V/S SANJAY SHARMA
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate HARPAL SINGH
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR Misc. Application no. 18 Instituted on: 16.07.2014 Decided on: 28.04.2015Sanjay Sharma son of Shri Ram Sarup resident of Guru Nanak Colony, H.No.468, Sangrur. …. Applicant. Versus1. Managi...
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2015
Max Bupa Health Ins. Company Ltd. V/S Achla Goswami
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Sh. Rajeev Sharma,Adv Adv.
Respondant Advocate G.S.Sandhu,Adv
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:580 of 2014Date of Institution:11.11.2014Date of Decision:23.04.2015Achla Goswamy w/o Sh.Praveen Goswamy, R/o H.No.1285, Sector 42-B, Chandigarh. …..ComplainantVersus1] Customer Servi...
Case Number: 580
|
Date of Filing: 11-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 07-05-2015
Max bhupa health ins V/S suriinder kumar s/o shori lal
Court Name: Amritsar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/14/6481. suriinder kumar s/o shori lalakstha enclave c block ranjit avenue AmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Max bhupa health inssalconhas ...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2014
|
Date of Upload: 04-05-2015
Micro Max Informatics Ltd.,21/14A V/S Bhavya.E.V
Court Name: Kannur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 06-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 04-06-2015
MAX HEALTH CARE INSTITUTE LTD. V/S KASHMIRI LAL SACHDEVA ( DECEASED)
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision: 17.04.2015First Appeal No. 869/2010Kashmiri Lal Sachdeva (Deceased),Through L.R. Smt. Susheela Sachdeva,D-231, Prasant Vihar,New Delhi-110085.……Appella...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2015
M/s. Max Life Insurance Co. Ltd V/S Gundu Vijaya
Max Life Insurance Life Insurance Life Insurance Max
Court Name: Hyderabad-III
Appelant Advocate M/s. A. Balaiah
Respondant Advocate M. Pavan Kumar
Case Number: 142
|
Date of Filing: 05-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2016
Max New York Life Insurance Co. Ltd. V/S Geeta Devi
Life Insurance Life Insurance Max
Court Name: Kullu
Appelant Advocate Sh. M.K. Sood
Respondant Advocate Sh. Lalit Thakur
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 04-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 18-04-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Max in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Max ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Max under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.