Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate VIPUL JOSHI
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Date of Instituion:06.02.2023 Date of final hearing:09.02.2023 Date of pronouncement: 09.02.2023First Appeal No.115 of 2023IN THE MATTER OFMarico Limited through authorized representative, 7th Floor, Grande Palladiu...
Case Number: 115
|
Date of Filing: 06-02-2023
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2023
Court Name: South Goa
Appelant Advocate Vivekanand V. Sukhthanker/ Sachin Kholkar
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 69
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2019
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2019
United India Insurance Marico Plywood Insurance
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. S. K. Das Mr. S. K. Mitruka
Respondant Advocate Mr. Soumendra Nath Ganguly
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087Complaint Case No. CC/119/20121. M/s. Marico Plywood Industries Pvt. Ltd.3rd Mile, Sevoke Road, R.M. Compound, Chayan Para, P.O. Salugara, P.S. Bhakti Nagar, Dist. Jalpaiguri, West Be...
Case Number: 119
|
Date of Filing: 06-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-08-2016
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT.Admn. Bldg., 3rd Floor, Near Chetana College, Govt. Colony, Bandra(East), Mumbai-400 051.Complaint Case No. 2007/732 1. M/S. MARICO LTD RANG SHARADA , K.C.MARG, BANDRA RECLAMATION , BANDRA (W), MUMBAI-50 ...........Appe...
Case Number: 2007
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate U.Ramadas/Sanjit Ramadas
Respondant Advocate Mahesh Kadam
Complaint Case No. 323/20071. Marico Ltd.Rang sharda K. Marg,Bandra MumbaiMumbaiMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Cholamandalam Ms.Gen Insc.Co.Ltd.MumbaiMumbaiMaharashtra............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE Shri S B Dhumal PRESIDENT Shri S.S. Patil ...
Case Number: 323
|
Date of Filing: 26-12-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DCF, South Mumbai
Appelant Advocate U. Ramdas
Respondant Advocate Rajesh Jain
Complaint Case No. 5/20071. Marico Industries Ltd. ors mumbai ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Delhi Assam Roadways Corporation Ltd. mumbai ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRESIDENT Shri S.S. Patil , HONORABLE MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERPER SHR...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 05-01-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: North 24 Parganas
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 113
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-1999
|
Date of Upload: 21-10-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Marico in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Marico ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Marico under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.