Mapsko
Latest Judgments
Total 75 Consumer Court Cases Against Mapsko.
Mapsko Builders V/S Monika D/o Narender Singh
Mapsko Mapsko Builders Narender Singh
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate R.A. Tyagi
Respondant Advocate V.S. Lather
Case Number: 233
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2017
|
Date of Upload: 13-11-2017
MAPSKO BUILDERS PVT LTD V/S ASHOK YADAV
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER REDRESSAL FORUM-III (WEST)C-BLOCK, COMMUNITY CENTRE,PANKHA ROAD, JANAK PURI, NEW DELHIComplaint Case No. CC/12/4761. ASHOK YADAVDELHI...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MAPSKO BUILDERS PVT LTDDELHI............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Sh. R.S.BANGRI PRESIDEN...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 18-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-10-2017
MAPSKO BUILDERS PVT. LTD. V/S JAI KARAN SINGH
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAJESH KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision :15.9.2017Complaint Case No.1230/17Sh. Jai Karan SinghS/o Sh. Chhattar SinghR/o V.P.O. LathTehsil – GohanaDistrict – SonepatHaryana……Complai...
Case Number: 1230
|
Date of Filing: 24-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-10-2017
mapsko Builders Private Limited V/S Sanjeev Kumar
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Naveen Ranga
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 332
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 11-08-2017
Mapsko builders V/S Jai karan
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CC-168/16 D.O.O- 07.07.2017Present :- Counsel for parties. Opposite party failed to file evidence by way of affidavit. Counsel for opposite party submitted that as per schedule 1 of the buyers agreement total sale price of the Plot is Rs.21,06,250/-(Rs. Twenty one lakhs six t...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 29-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-07-2017
The Manager Mapsko Builders Pvt. Ltd V/S Mrs. Sunil Dahiya
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Revision Petition No.27 of 2015Date of the Institution: 31.03.2015Date of Decision: 08.05.2017Mrs. Sunil Dahiya W/o Anup Singh Dahiya, R/o H.NO.3239, Sector 15, Sonepat.…..PetitionersVersus1. The Manager Maps...
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 31-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 23-02-2018
M/s Mapsko Builders Pvt. Ltd. V/S Onkar Tyagi
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Ram Avtar Tyagi
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPATComplaint case No. : CC/445 of 2016Instituted On : 27.10.2016Date of order : 17.04.2017Onkar Tyagi son of Atar Singh, resident of house No. 970, Sector 15, sonepat. ……Complainant.V/s M/s Mapsko Builders...
Case Number: 445
|
Date of Filing: 27-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-04-2017
MAPSKO BUILDERS PVT.LTD. V/S RAJINDER P. KAPANI
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SANPA CHAUHAN
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments: 15.07.2016 Date of Decision: 18.07.2016Complaint No. 582/2016 & 583/2016In the matter of:Rajinder P. Kapani,S/o Sh. N.R. Kapani,R/o 27087, Road Court, Chantilly,V...
Case Number: 583
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-08-2016
MAPSKO BUILDERS PVT.LTD. V/S RAJINDER P. KAPANI
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SAPNA CHAUHAN
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments: 15.07.2016 Date of Decision: 18.07.2016Complaint No. 582/2016 & 583/2016In the matter of:Rajinder P. Kapani,S/o Sh. N.R. Kapani,R/o 27087, Road Court, Chantilly,V...
Case Number: 582
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-08-2016
M/s Mapsko Builders Pvt. Ltd. V/S Arti W/o Vipin Kumar
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Varun Gulia
Respondant Advocate V.S. Lather
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.455 of 2015 Instituted on:11.12.2015 Date of order:15.06.2016Ms.Arti wife of Vipin Kumar, resident of H.No.644/21, Narender Nagar, Holy Child School road, Sonepat. ……Complainant VERSUS1....
Case Number: 455
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 12-07-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Mapsko in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Mapsko ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Mapsko under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.