Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Revision Petition No.27 of 2015Date of the Institution: 31.03.2015Date of Decision: 08.05.2017Mrs. Sunil Dahiya W/o Anup Singh Dahiya, R/o H.NO.3239, Sector 15, Sonepat.…..PetitionersVersus1. The Manager Maps...
Case Number: 27
|
Date of Filing: 31-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 23-02-2018
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Ram Avtar Tyagi
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPATComplaint case No. : CC/445 of 2016Instituted On : 27.10.2016Date of order : 17.04.2017Onkar Tyagi son of Atar Singh, resident of house No. 970, Sector 15, sonepat. ……Complainant.V/s M/s Mapsko Builders...
Case Number: 445
|
Date of Filing: 27-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-04-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SANPA CHAUHAN
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments: 15.07.2016 Date of Decision: 18.07.2016Complaint No. 582/2016 & 583/2016In the matter of:Rajinder P. Kapani,S/o Sh. N.R. Kapani,R/o 27087, Road Court, Chantilly,V...
Case Number: 583
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SAPNA CHAUHAN
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments: 15.07.2016 Date of Decision: 18.07.2016Complaint No. 582/2016 & 583/2016In the matter of:Rajinder P. Kapani,S/o Sh. N.R. Kapani,R/o 27087, Road Court, Chantilly,V...
Case Number: 582
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 09-08-2016
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Varun Gulia
Respondant Advocate V.S. Lather
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.455 of 2015 Instituted on:11.12.2015 Date of order:15.06.2016Ms.Arti wife of Vipin Kumar, resident of H.No.644/21, Narender Nagar, Holy Child School road, Sonepat. ……Complainant VERSUS1....
Case Number: 455
|
Date of Filing: 10-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 12-07-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AJAY PATHAK
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA. Complaint No.56 of 2016 Date of Institution: 02.03.2016 Date of Decision: 29.03.2016Sh.Ramandeep Singh and Sh.Kawaldeep Singh S/o Sh.Harbans Singh 274 Basant Avenue Ludhiana Punjab 141013 through Sh.Ramandeep Sing...
Case Number: 56
|
Date of Filing: 02-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-05-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986Complaint Case No. CC/268/20141. VISHAL BHANDOR/O C-15, JVTS GARDENS, CHATTARPUR EXTN., NEW DELHI............Complainant(s)Versus1. MAPSKO BUILDERS PVT. LTD.CORPORATE OFFICE:- 52, NORTH A...
Case Number: 268
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-04-2015
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate MANNU MALIK
Respondant Advocate
Execution petition No. EA136/2014Complainants No. 166 of 2013Instituted on 16.10.2014Manish Kumar R/o House No. 256/23, Kath Mandi – Sonepat…………………Complainant/ApplicantVersus1.M/s Mapsko Builders Pvt. Ltd., Regd. Office at 52...
Case Number: 136
|
Date of Filing: 16-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANISH R. SHAH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3042 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 02/05/2014 in Appeal No. 313/2014 of the State Commission Haryana)1. JOGINDER SINGHS/O BAL RAJ SINGH , R/O WARD NO-7, DELHI ROAD, KHARKHODADISTRICT - SONEPATHARYANA...
Case Number: 3042
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAKESH BHARDWAJ
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3696 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 30/08/2010 in Appeal No. 991/2010 of the State Commission Haryana)1. M/S. MAPSKO BUILDERS PVT. LTD. & ANR.52, North Avenue Road, Punjabi Bagh (West)New Delhi - 1100...
Case Number: 3696
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2011
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Mapsko Builders in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Mapsko Builders ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Mapsko Builders under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.