Mangalore
Latest Judgments
Total 93 Consumer Court Cases Against Mangalore.
Amruth Mahila Kaigarika Sahakari Sangha Niyamita,Pratima Manjunath Bhat, Yellapur, President V/S Smt. Jayalaxmi Dattatreya Bhat, Mangalore
Court Name: Uttara Kannda
Appelant Advocate Sri.D.A.Naik
Respondant Advocate Sri.R.V.Raykar
Case Number: 35
|
Date of Filing: 05-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 22-05-2020
The Commissioner, Mangalore City Corporation V/S Mr.Pascal Donald Pinto
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/246/2010( Date of Filing : 08 Sep 2010 )1. Mr.Pascal Donald PintoAged about 43 years, So. Joachim Pinto, Hill Mill, Near Kelrai Church, Pedamale, Mangalore Taluk...........Compl...
Case Number: 246
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 16-02-2019
The Station Master, Mangalore Central Railway Station V/S Savitha Bhat
Court Name: Kasaragod
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/10/1941. Savitha BhatRetired Teaher, CC.No.36, Chunmaya Colony, VidyanagarKasaragodKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Station Master, Mangalore Central Railway StationPo.MangaloreMangaloreKarnataka2. Divisional Commercial Manager Southern Railway, P...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M.s Mandovi Motors Pvt. V/S P.A.Jose DGM Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Ltd
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate K.B. Rai
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/2/2010( Date of Filing : 01 Jan 2010 )1. P.A.Jose DGM Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals LtdMangalore...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M.s Mandovi Motors Pvt. Mangalore.........
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 01-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 01-01-2019
Vice Chancellor, Mangalore University V/S Hitesh Kumar N.A
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate Prakash K.P.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/68/2010( Date of Filing : 19 Feb 2010 )1. Hitesh Kumar N.AS.o. Padmavathi, Kodagu...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Vice Chancellor, Mangalore UniversityMangalore............Opp....
Case Number: 68
|
Date of Filing: 19-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 11-01-2019
PRINCIPAL GENERAL MANAGER, BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD., MANGALORE D.K. V/S K. PRABHAKARA ACHARYA
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Mangalore
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2203 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 11/07/2008 in Appeal No. 1084/2008 of the State Commission Karnataka) 1. K. PRABHAKARA ACHARYAVidyananara . Kinya Post. Mangalore D.K.575023 ...........Petitioner(s)...
Case Number: 2203
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2008
|
Date of Upload: 06-04-2010
The Commissioner, Mangalore City Corporation V/S Dr.Sunil P Shenoy
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 173
|
Date of Filing: 11-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 23-05-2019
Sri. N.M.Naik, President, Sahyadri Vividoddesh Sahakari Sangha Niyamita Ankola V/S Shri Shrinidhi Dattatreya Mangalore
Court Name: Uttara Kannda
Appelant Advocate Sri. V.N.Bhagwar
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 52
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-2009
|
Date of Upload: 14-05-2020
Sri. N.M.Naik, President, Sahyadri Vividoddesh Sahakari Sangha Niyamita Ankola V/S Vidya Shripati Mangalore
Court Name: Uttara Kannda
Appelant Advocate Sri. V.N.Bhagwar
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 51
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-2009
|
Date of Upload: 14-05-2020
Sri. N.M.Naik, President, Sahyadri Vividoddesh Sahakari Sangha Niyamita Ankola V/S Shrinath Dattatreya Mangalore
Court Name: Uttara Kannda
Appelant Advocate Sri.V.N.Bhagwat
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 53
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-2009
|
Date of Upload: 14-05-2020
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Mangalore in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Mangalore ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Mangalore under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.