Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate VIJAY CHAVHAN
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/850(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/07/2010 in Case No. 585/09 of District Kolhapur) 1. MR BHAGAWAN MAHADEV PATIL R/O AYALUJ TAL PANHALA KOLHAPUR MAHARASHTRA ...........Appell...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr.Walimbe
Respondant Advocate Mr.Mahendra L.Chavan
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/494(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/12/2009 in Case No. 389/2008 of District Pune) 1. SHRI BABUSAHEB MAHADEV BADADE & ORSHADPSAR PUNE Maharastra2. BHUSHAN BAPUSAHEB BADADEAT S....
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 06-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate KOLEKAR
Respondant Advocate -
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/10/161(Arisen out of Order Dated 22/08/2007 in Case No. 292/2007 of District Sangli) 1. SHRI MAHESH MAHADEV DABHOLEMADHAV NAGAR ROAD SANGLIMaharastra2. Shri Shankar Hindurao Ch...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 09-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kolhapur
Appelant Advocate P.B.Jadhav.
Respondant Advocate G.G.Joshi.
monthly reportDistrict Consumer Forum, KolhapurComplaint Case No. CC/09/577 1. Prkash Mahadev Mane.Kasba Bid.Tal-Karvir. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution ltd.Koge.Tal-Krvir.Kolhapur ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HONABLE MR. Mr.M.D.Desh...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Satara
Appelant Advocate Adv. V.P. Mule
Respondant Advocate
ReportsDistrict Consumer disputes redressal Forum Satara Near Cooperative Court Sadara Bazar Satara-415001CONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 107 1. Shri Abhijeet Mahadev DesaiYashwant Highschool Shaniwar peth Karad Dist SatarasataraMaharastra ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Phaltan Treders Nag...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Satara
Appelant Advocate shinde
Respondant Advocate
ReportsDistrict Consumer disputes redressal Forum Satara Near Cooperative Court Sadara Bazar Satara-415001CONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 112 1. shri hanmnat mahadev sakundeshrianbe tal koregaon dist sataraMaharastra ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. dadasaheb sakhavalkar sah patsnstha excel ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 12-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Sindhudurg
Appelant Advocate Shri Vilas Parab
Respondant Advocate Shri Desai
Execution Application No. EA/09/431. Shri. Shivram Mahadev TeliR/O Madhewada B Bord Tal SawantwadiSindhuduragMaharastra...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Star Associate Industries, Pro. Delip AsopaR/O BangloreBangloreMaharastra...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. Mr.Mahendra...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT.Admn. Bldg., 3rd Floor, Near Chetana College, Govt. Colony, Bandra(East), Mumbai-400 051.Complaint Case No. 2006/53 1. MAHADEV SAKHARAM KADAM 45,BLDG NO-A,ASMITA CHS LTD,4th FLOOR,MARVE ROAD,MALVANI MALAD WEST MUM- .......
Case Number: 2006
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VISHAAL S. JOGDAND
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 21 Jan 2010 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/458/2010(Against the Order dated 23/09/2009 in Appeal No. 943/2005 of the State Commission Maharastra) 1. SHYAMSUNDER MAHADEV KARPER/at Jawalban, Tq. KaijBeed(Maharash...
Case Number: 458
|
Date of Filing: 21-01-2010
|
Date of Upload: 10-02-2010
Court Name: Thane
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, THANE. Room No.214, 2nd Floor, Collector Office, Court Naka, Thane(W)consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/496 MAHADEV MATHRE ...........Appellant(s)Vs.IC A. NATIONAL COLLEGE ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: Complainant(s)/Appellant(s): OppositeParty/R...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 29-07-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Mahadev in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Mahadev ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Mahadev under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.