Court Name: Kolhapur
Appelant Advocate S.S.Yadav
Respondant Advocate Ashok Shrimal
monthly reportDistrict Consumer Forum, KolhapurComplaint Case No. CC/09/776 1. Mahadev Ganapati BachateBahireshwar, Tal-Karveer, Kolhapur. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Sheti Biz BhandarLalchand Complex, Vyapari Peth, Shahupuri, Kolhapur 416 001.2. Chairman, Vardha Seeds Co. t...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate U S MANGAVE
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIRevision Petition No. RP/11/7(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/01/2011 in Case No. 663/09 of District Kolhapur)1. RAJSHEKHAR VISHNUPANT BHOSALER/O 2454 D WARD VISHNU PLAZA APT OPP BHARAT DAIRY MANGALW...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 04-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kolhapur
Appelant Advocate S,M,Potdar
Respondant Advocate Sangram Chavan
monthly reportDistrict Consumer Forum, KolhapurComplaint Case No. CC/09/661 1. Sujay Baburao Patil, 2454 B Ward, Vishnu Plaza Apartment, Flat No.101, Opp.Bharat Dairy, Magalwar Peth, Kolhapur(Complainant in Complaint No.661/09)2. Shri Arun Prabhakar Gadgil, R/o. 2454 B Ward, Vish...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kolhapur
Appelant Advocate S.P.Powar
Respondant Advocate
monthly reportDistrict Consumer Forum, KolhapurExecution Application No. EA/09/139 1. Mahadev Vinayak Powar Pattankodoli Kolhapur ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Baburao Mahajan Nagari Sah. Pat Sanstha Ltd. and OthersKonwade Tal. Bhudargad Kolhapur ...........Respondent(s) BEFOR...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kolhapur
Appelant Advocate S.T.Magdum
Respondant Advocate B.M.Mandpe
monthly reportDistrict Consumer Forum, KolhapurComplaint Case No. CC/10/447 1. Chandrakant Mahadev BhosalePattankodoli Tal-Hatkanangale.KolhapurKolhapurMaharashtra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Priydarshni Mahila Garamin Bigar Sheti Sah Pat SansthaPattankodoli Tal-Hatkanangal...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Satara
Appelant Advocate A.Kadam
Respondant Advocate
ReportsDistrict Consumer disputes redressal Forum Satara Near Cooperative Court Sadara Bazar Satara-415001CONSUMER CASE NO. 10 of 227 1. Shri Mahadev Ramchandr MisalA/p Kushi {Savargahr} Tal Pathan Dist satarasatara ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Santisagar Na. Sah. Patsanstha Chai...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate GANDBHIR
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT.Admn. Bldg., 3rd Floor, Near Chetana College, Govt. Colony, Bandra(East), Mumbai-400 051.Complaint Case No. CC/09/641 1. MRS VIJAYA RAGHUNATH KARNIKJ/10, BIMA NAGAR, M.V. ROAD, ANDHERI-EAST, MUMBAI-69. ...........Appell...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 18-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kolhapur
Appelant Advocate S,M.Potdar
Respondant Advocate A.S.Attar
monthly reportDistrict Consumer Forum, KolhapurExecution Application No. EA/06/204 1. Baburao Mahadev PatilKhochi Tal-Hatkanangle ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Shri Ganesh Yapari Nagari Sah Pat Sanstha and others.Peth Vadgaon.Tal-Hatkanangle.Kolhapur ...........Respondent(s) B...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 18-11-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Kolhapur
Appelant Advocate S.A.Sangar
Respondant Advocate D.R,Patil
monthly reportDistrict Consumer Forum, KolhapurExecution Application No. EA/08/329 1. Rajesh Mahadev Sangar18/136.E Ward.Shastrinagar.Kolhapur ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Kagal Taluka Vahandhark Nagaari Sah Pat Sanstha Kagal Tal-Kagal.Kolhapur ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Thane
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, THANE. Room No.214, 2nd Floor, Collector Office, Court Naka, Thane(W)Execution Application No. EA/09/28 1. Mr.Ram Mahadev TayadeFlat No.2, 2nd floor, Gaurav Anand CHS, Kopari Gaon, Thane(E). ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Maharashtra State El...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Mahadev in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Mahadev ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Mahadev under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.