Madhya Pradesh Gramin Bank
Latest Judgments
Total 85 Consumer Court Cases Against Madhya Pradesh Gramin Bank.
RAMAVTAR V/S CENTRAL MADHYA PRADESH GRAMIN BANK
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
LOK ADALATM.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,76, Arera Hills, BHOPAL 462 011 (M.P.)(Proceedings under Chapter VI of The Legal Services Authorities Act 1987 (39 of 1987) and Lok Adalat Scheme of 1997 framed thereunder)FA No.262/2017.Branch Manager,Central Madhya Prad...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
NARMADA PRASAD V/S CENTRAL MADHYA PRADESH GRAMIN BANK
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
LOK ADALATM.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,76, Arera Hills, BHOPAL 462 011 (M.P.)(Proceedings under Chapter VI of The Legal Services Authorities Act 1987 (39 of 1987) and Lok Adalat Scheme of 1997 framed thereunder)FA No.265/2017.Branch Manager,Central Madhya Prad...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
SURESH CHANDRA V/S CENTRAL MADHYA PRADESH GRAMIN BANK
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
LOK ADALATM.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,76, Arera Hills, BHOPAL 462 011 (M.P.)(Proceedings under Chapter VI of The Legal Services Authorities Act 1987 (39 of 1987) and Lok Adalat Scheme of 1997 framed thereunder)FA No.266/2017.Branch Manager,Central Madhya Prad...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
MUKESH V/S CENTRAL MADHYA PRADESH GRAMIN BANK
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
LOK ADALATM.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,76, Arera Hills, BHOPAL 462 011 (M.P.)(Proceedings under Chapter VI of The Legal Services Authorities Act 1987 (39 of 1987) and Lok Adalat Scheme of 1997 framed thereunder)FA No.256/2017.Branch Manager,Central Madhya Prad...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
KRISHNA BAI V/S CENTRAL MADHYA PRADESH GRAMIN BANK
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
LOK ADALATM.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,76, Arera Hills, BHOPAL 462 011 (M.P.)(Proceedings under Chapter VI of The Legal Services Authorities Act 1987 (39 of 1987) and Lok Adalat Scheme of 1997 framed thereunder)FA No.257/2017.Branch Manager,Central Madhya Prad...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
RAJESH V/S CENTRAL MADHYA PRADESH GRAMIN BANK
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
LOK ADALATM.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,76, Arera Hills, BHOPAL 462 011 (M.P.)(Proceedings under Chapter VI of The Legal Services Authorities Act 1987 (39 of 1987) and Lok Adalat Scheme of 1997 framed thereunder)FA No.258/2017.Branch Manager,Central Madhya Prad...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
RAJESH V/S CENTRAL MADHYA PRADESH GRAMIN BANK
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
LOK ADALATM.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,76, Arera Hills, BHOPAL 462 011 (M.P.)(Proceedings under Chapter VI of The Legal Services Authorities Act 1987 (39 of 1987) and Lok Adalat Scheme of 1997 framed thereunder)FA No.259/2017.Branch Manager,Central Madhya Prad...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
GEETA BAI V/S CENTRAL MADHYA PRADESH GRAMIN BANK
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
LOK ADALATM.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,76, Arera Hills, BHOPAL 462 011 (M.P.)(Proceedings under Chapter VI of The Legal Services Authorities Act 1987 (39 of 1987) and Lok Adalat Scheme of 1997 framed thereunder)FA No.260/2017.Branch Manager,Central Madhya Prad...
Case Number: 17
|
Date of Filing: 14-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-03-2019
CENTRAL MADHYA PRADESH GRAMIN BANK V/S PRABHAT KUMAR PARASHAR
Court Name: Bhind
Appelant Advocate ANIL MISHRA
Respondant Advocate MAHESH MISHRA
Case Number: 2
|
Date of Filing: 04-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-12-2018
Central madhya pradesh gramin bank through branch manager V/S Noor kha
Court Name: Hoshangabad
Appelant Advocate Chandrashekhar rusiya
Respondant Advocate Hemant Kumar Malviya
Case Number: 18
|
Date of Filing: 06-06-2018
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2018
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Madhya Pradesh Gramin Bank in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Madhya Pradesh Gramin Bank ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Madhya Pradesh Gramin Bank under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.