Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC/156/06 Dated:Case No.TC/1158/07In the matter of:SH. PADMAVATHY SRINIVASAN & ANR560 MANDAKINI ENCLAVE,NEW DELHI …….....
Case Number: 1158
|
Date of Filing: 27-11-2007
|
Date of Upload: 19-03-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Adeei Ahmad
Respondant Advocate T N Saxena, Ashok Shukla
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2001/2378(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Lufthansa German AirlinesA...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/s Moha...
Case Number: 2001
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-2001
|
Date of Upload: 05-06-2015
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. S. NARAIN & CO.
Respondant Advocate MS. YASHMEET KAUR & MS. APARNA SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 771 OF 2013 IN OP/310/19991. AFL LTD............Appellants(s)Versus1. LUFTHANSA CARGO INDIA PVT. LTD............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BL...
Case Number: 771
|
Date of Filing: 06-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-07-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LUTHRA & LUTHRA LAW OFFICES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 771 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 08/10/2013 in Appeal No. 71/2013 of the State Commission Punjab) WITH IA/506/20141. LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES(THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE) 12TH FLOOR DLF ...
Case Number: 771
|
Date of Filing: 23-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 11-02-2014
Court Name: East Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Convenient Shopping Centre, Saini Enclave, DELHI -110092DELHI EASTComplaint Case No. cc/946/20131. Shri Devi Prasad KhandelwalB 234, Yojana Vihar Delhi 110 092...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Lufthansa12th Floor DLF Building No. 10 B New Delhi 110 002............Opp.Party(s) BEF...
Case Number: 946
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 06-10-2016
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LUTHRA & LUTHRA
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3830 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 06/08/2013 in Appeal No. 424/2012 of the State Commission West Bengal) WITH IA/6792/20131. M/S. LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES(THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE) 12...
Case Number: 3830
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-12-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. S. NARAIN & CO.
Respondant Advocate MS. YASHMEET KAUR & MS. APARNA SINGH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 310 OF 19991. AFL LTD.-...........Complainant(s)Versus1. LUFTHANSA CARGO INDIA PVT. LTD.-...........Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. DR. S.M. KANTIKAR, M...
Case Number: 310
|
Date of Filing: 09-11-1999
|
Date of Upload: 31-10-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate
Respondant Advocate MR. SANJEEV PURI & MR. NAVVEN TIKU
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 770 OF 2012 IN OP/72/20021. GENTRA EXPORTS PVT. LTD............Appellants(s)Versus1. LUFTHANSA CARGO...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE...
Case Number: 770
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 10-07-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate M/S. LUTHRA & LUTHRA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 274 OF 2012 IN RP/4127/20111. NITIN GOEL...........Appellants(s)Versus1. LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE M...
Case Number: 274
|
Date of Filing: 25-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 11-02-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LUTHRA & LUTHRA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1737 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 28/02/2012 in Appeal No. 600/2009 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES12th floor,DLF Building No-10 Tower B DLF City Phase-II GurgaonHarya...
Case Number: 1739
|
Date of Filing: 27-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 27-11-2012
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Lufthansa in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Lufthansa ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Lufthansa under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.