company-name-logo

Lucknow Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 120 Consumer Court Cases Against Lucknow Development Authority.

NCDRC

BANSI DHAR DUBEY V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED, MR. MILAN LASKAR, MR. S.A. SAUD & MR. M. P. DABAS

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1343 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 18/12/2013 in Appeal No. 2834/2013 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/1573/2014,IA/1574/20141. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRERTARY, 6 J...

Case Number: 1343

|

Date of Filing: 07-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 27-03-2014

NCDRC

GANESH SHANKER TRIPATHI V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED, MR. MILAN LASKAR, MR. S.A. SAUD & MR. M. P. DABAS

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1344 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 13/01/2012 in Appeal No. 136/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/1575/2014,IA/1576/2014,IA/1577/20141. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SEC...

Case Number: 1344

|

Date of Filing: 07-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 27-03-2014

NCDRC

AFFAQE HUSAIN RAZVI V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG

Respondant Advocate MR. NIKHIL JAIN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2805 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 14/02/2008 in Appeal No. 819/2000 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY6, Jagdish Chandra Bose Marg,LucknowUttar Pradesh..............

Case Number: 2805

|

Date of Filing: 08-07-2008

|

Date of Upload: 05-02-2014

NCDRC

VISHNUJI RAM V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED & MR. MILAN LASKAR

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3138 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 11/10/2012 in Appeal No. 1815/2012 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/5523/20131. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYNAVEEN BHAWAN ,BIPINKHAND, GOMTI NAGAR, ...

Case Number: 3138

|

Date of Filing: 02-09-2013

|

Date of Upload: 11-12-2013

NCDRC

BEENA SINGH V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG

Respondant Advocate MR. RAJESH CHADHA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2225 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 17/11/2011 in Appeal No. 175/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYNaveen Bhawan, Bhipin Khand, Gomti NagarLucknowU.P.............

Case Number: 2225

|

Date of Filing: 06-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 29-10-2013

NCDRC

RAKESH GUPTA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG

Respondant Advocate MR. NIKHIL JAIN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 524 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 18/09/2007 in Appeal No. 465/2007 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYBipin Khand, Naveen Bhawan, Gomti nagarLucknowU.P...........P...

Case Number: 524

|

Date of Filing: 06-02-2012

|

Date of Upload: 04-09-2013

NCDRC

JAGDISH SARAN SHIRIVASTAVA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2224 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/01/2012 in Appeal No. 1296/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYNaveen Bhawan, Bipin Khand, Gomti NagarLucknowU.P.............

Case Number: 2224

|

Date of Filing: 06-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 26-08-2013

NCDRC

SHAFIQ AHMED V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMED SYED

Respondant Advocate M/S. NOO UI ISLAM & ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2071 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/02/2012 in Appeal No. 1924/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Secratary, 6 Jagdish Chand Bose Marg,LucknowU.P...

Case Number: 2071

|

Date of Filing: 25-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 17-09-2013

NCDRC

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S PONNAMMA K.K.

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. S.S. NAIR

Respondant Advocate MR. S.A. SYED

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2470 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 17/03/2008 in Appeal No. 2934/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. PONNAMMA K.K.K.G.M.U. Hospital Chowk,LucknowUttar Pradesh...........Petitioner(s)Versus1...

Case Number: 2470

|

Date of Filing: 06-06-2008

|

Date of Upload: 20-05-2013

NCDRC

RAKESH GUPTA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG

Respondant Advocate MR. NIKHIL JAIN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 784 OF 2012 IN RP/524/20121. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. RAKESH GUPTA...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER Fo...

Case Number: 784

|

Date of Filing: 18-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 20-11-2012

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Lucknow Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Lucknow Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Lucknow Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.