Lucknow Development Authority
Latest Judgments
Total 120 Consumer Court Cases Against Lucknow Development Authority.
URMILA TRIVEDI V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 494 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 20/02/2013 in Complaint No. 119/2001 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, 6, JAGDISH CHAND BOSE MARG, LUCKNOWU.P.....
Case Number: 494
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-11-2014
LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S PANKAJ SACHAN
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. G.N. SACHAN(AUTHORIZED PERSON)
Respondant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED & MR. MILAN LASKAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3348 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 03/07/2013 in Appeal No. 96/2004 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. PANKAJ SACHANS/O SHRI G.N SANCHAN , THROUGH G.N SACHAN AUTHORIZED PERSON, R/O B-8/3, BALDA...
Case Number: 3348
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-11-2014
Ravindra Bhargav V/S Lucknow Development Authority
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Malesh Kumar Pandey
Respondant Advocate -
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2013/2224(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Lucknow Development Authority- BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. Alok Kumar Bose...
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
PREM KISHOR SINGH & ANR. V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED & MR. MILAN LASKAR
Respondant Advocate MR. SALIL PAUL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3822 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 23/02/2012 in Appeal No. 2129/2008 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, JAGDISH CHAND BOSE MARG, LUCKNOWU.P....
Case Number: 3822
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 10-10-2014
DEVENDRA NATH MISHRA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED & MR. MILAN LASKAR
Respondant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK SRIVASTAVA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3632 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 25/03/2011 in Appeal No. 267/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY. 6 JAGDISH CHAND BOSE MARG, LUCKNOWU.P...
Case Number: 3632
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2014
SHARDA MISHRA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED & MR. MILAN LASKAR
Respondant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK SRIVASTAVA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3633 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 18/07/2012 in Appeal No. 1743/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, 6, JAGDISH CHAND BOSE MARG, LUCKNOWU...
Case Number: 3633
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-09-2014
ADARSH EDUCATIONAL WELFARE SOCIETY V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority Society
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED & MR. MILAN LASKAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2178 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 13/12/2011 in Appeal No. 13/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYNaveen Bhawan, Bipin Khand, Gomti NagarLucknowU.P...........P...
Case Number: 2178
|
Date of Filing: 01-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2014
LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RAM PYARI
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SALIL PAUL
Respondant Advocate MOHD. MONIS ABBASI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 932 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 21/11/2007 in Appeal No. 1372/2005 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. RAM PYARIRESIDENT OF 417/82, NEW AZGANJ, KALYANPURI THAKURGANJ, LUCKNOW...........Petitio...
Case Number: 932
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2008
|
Date of Upload: 10-07-2014
PURNIMA MISHRA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MILAN LASKAR, MR. PARVEZ DABAS & MR. S.A. SAUD
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2142 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 26/07/2011 in Appeal No. 773/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, 6 JAGDISH CHAND BOSE, MARG, LUCKNOWU....
Case Number: 2142
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 08-07-2014
HARSH VARDHAN V/S THE CHAIRMAN/COMMISSIONER, LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 3 ORS.
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED, MR. MILAN LASKAR, MR. PARVEZ DABAS & MR. S.A. SAUD
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2141 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 04/09/2013 in Appeal No. 517/2007 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. THE CHAIRMAN/COMMISSIONER, LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 3 ORS.THROUGH SECRETARY, 6 JAG...
Case Number: 2141
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-05-2014
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Lucknow Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Lucknow Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Lucknow Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.