company-name-logo

Lucknow Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 120 Consumer Court Cases Against Lucknow Development Authority.

NCDRC

MAHBOOB ALI V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. T.H. NAQVI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1436 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 08/09/2015 in Appeal No. 1922/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/4310/2016,IA/4311/2016,IA/4312/2016,IA/4313/20161. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYT...

Case Number: 1457

|

Date of Filing: 11-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-11-2016

NCDRC

MOHAMMAD HASEER V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. T.H. NAQVI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1436 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 08/09/2015 in Appeal No. 1922/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/4310/2016,IA/4311/2016,IA/4312/2016,IA/4313/20161. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYT...

Case Number: 1458

|

Date of Filing: 11-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-11-2016

NCDRC

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RAMESH CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VIJAY KUMAR YADAV

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2673 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 26/02/2015 in Appeal No. 1596/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. RAMESH CHANDRA SRIVASTAVAS/O K.N. SRIVASTAVA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT T-39, SHIVALIK NAGAR...

Case Number: 2673

|

Date of Filing: 12-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 15-09-2016

NCDRC

SHYAM KISHORE VERMA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY & MR. ANKIT MISHRA

Respondant Advocate MR. GYAN SINGH CHAUHAN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2790 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 03/08/2015 in Appeal No. 121/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAIN VIPIN KHAND, GOMTI NAGAR, LUCKNOW...

Case Number: 2790

|

Date of Filing: 28-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 31-08-2016

NCDRC

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S ALI H. ZAIDI

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MS. REETA CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 377 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 17/03/2016 in Complaint No. 275/2015 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. ALI H. ZAIDIS/O. MR. M.H. ZAIDI, 50-G, SECTOR-8, JASOLA VIHAR, DELHI-110025...........Appell...

Case Number: 377

|

Date of Filing: 19-04-2016

|

Date of Upload: 17-05-2016

NCDRC

SUSHIL KUMAR RAI V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED, MR. MILAN LASKAR, MR. S.A. SAUD & MR. M. P. DABAS

Respondant Advocate MR. GARVESH KABRA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1345-1346 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 04/09/2013 in Appeal No. 2136/2012 & 01/2013 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, 6 JAGDISH CHAND BOSE ...

Case Number: 1345

|

Date of Filing: 07-03-2014

|

Date of Upload: 18-05-2016

NCDRC

VICE PRESIDENT, LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S DR. SHEO PRATAP NARAIN

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 841 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 27/09/2012 in Appeal No. 267/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. DR. SHEO PRATAP NARAINS/O SRI JAGDISH NARAIN SRIVASTAVA, R/O G.K. 25, RAJROOP PUR, TEHSIL ...

Case Number: 841

|

Date of Filing: 28-03-2016

|

Date of Upload: 12-05-2016

Uttar Pradesh

Lucknow Development Authority V/S Kuwar Bahdur Srivastava

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Yashpal Singh

Respondant Advocate -

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Revision Petition No. R/110/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Kuwar Bahdur Srivastavaa...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Luckno...

Case Number: 110

|

Date of Filing: 30-09-2014

|

Date of Upload: 09-12-2015

NCDRC

SOFIYA BADAR V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1212 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 20/01/2010 in Appeal No. 92/2010 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Secretary, 6, Jagdish Chand Bose MargLucknow(Utta...

Case Number: 1212

|

Date of Filing: 26-03-2010

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2014

NCDRC

MANOJ SHARMA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMED SYED

Respondant Advocate R.R ASSOCIATES LAW FIRM

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2428 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 21/01/2014 in Appeal No. 74/2006 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, 6 JAGDISH CHAND BOSE MARG, LUCKNOWU.P....

Case Number: 2428

|

Date of Filing: 02-06-2014

|

Date of Upload: 02-12-2014

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Lucknow Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Lucknow Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Lucknow Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.