company-name-logo

Lucknow Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 120 Consumer Court Cases Against Lucknow Development Authority.

NCDRC

SHANTI DEVI V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. AVIRAL SAXENA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1339 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 17/11/2014 in Appeal No. 2212/2013 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH SECRETARY, NAVEEN BHAWAN, VIPIN KHAND, GOMTINAGARLU...

Case Number: 1339

|

Date of Filing: 18-05-2017

|

Date of Upload: 24-11-2017

NCDRC

SURAIYA BANO V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED

Respondant Advocate M/S. R.R. & ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2932 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 31/07/2015 in Appeal No. 744/2014 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.PRADHIKARAN BHAWAN, VIPIN KHAND GOMTI NAGAR THROUGH I...

Case Number: 2932

|

Date of Filing: 06-10-2016

|

Date of Upload: 17-10-2017

NCDRC

VIRENDRA SHUKLA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 502 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 22/09/2014 in Appeal No. 1671/2014 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH VICE-CHAIRMAN, VIPIN KHAND, GOMTI NAGAR,LUCKNOWUTTAR...

Case Number: 502

|

Date of Filing: 27-02-2017

|

Date of Upload: 17-05-2017

NCDRC

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. V/S PREM CHANDRA

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. R.R. & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 932 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 24/06/2016 in Complaint No. 164/2001 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. PREM CHANDRAS/O. SRI RAM DAYAL, R/O. 106, RUSTAMPUR, DISTT-GORAKHPUR, UTTAR PRADESH ...........

Case Number: 932

|

Date of Filing: 28-07-2016

|

Date of Upload: 25-04-2017

NCDRC

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S RADHEY SHYAM SHUKLA

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate IN PERSON

Respondant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4197 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 31/07/2009 in Appeal No. 82/2009 & 63/2006 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. RADHEY SHYAM SHUKLAS/O SHRI VASUDEV SHUKLA, R/O B-1-34/L ALIGANJ, LUCKNOWU.P.......

Case Number: 4197

|

Date of Filing: 20-11-2014

|

Date of Upload: 23-11-2016

NCDRC

DR. RAMESH CHAND CHADDHA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED & MR. MILAN LASKAR

Respondant Advocate MR. NIKHIL JAIN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3823-3824 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 03/02/2011 in Appeal No. 791/2005 & 960/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, 6 JAGDISH CHAND BOSE ...

Case Number: 3823

|

Date of Filing: 25-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 18-11-2016

NCDRC

IQTIDAR AHMAD V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. T.H. NAQVI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1436 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 08/09/2015 in Appeal No. 1922/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/4310/2016,IA/4311/2016,IA/4312/2016,IA/4313/20161. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYT...

Case Number: 1436

|

Date of Filing: 09-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-11-2016

NCDRC

ALTAF AHMAD V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. T.H. NAQVI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1436 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 08/09/2015 in Appeal No. 1922/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/4310/2016,IA/4311/2016,IA/4312/2016,IA/4313/20161. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYT...

Case Number: 1437

|

Date of Filing: 09-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-11-2016

NCDRC

SARDAR BALDEV SINGH V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. T.H. NAQVI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1436 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 08/09/2015 in Appeal No. 1922/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/4310/2016,IA/4311/2016,IA/4312/2016,IA/4313/20161. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYT...

Case Number: 1438

|

Date of Filing: 09-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-11-2016

NCDRC

KRIPAL SINGH V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. T.H. NAQVI

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1436 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 08/09/2015 in Appeal No. 1922/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) WITH IA/4310/2016,IA/4311/2016,IA/4312/2016,IA/4313/20161. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYT...

Case Number: 1456

|

Date of Filing: 11-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 15-11-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Lucknow Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Lucknow Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Lucknow Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.