company-name-logo

Lucknow Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 120 Consumer Court Cases Against Lucknow Development Authority.

Uttar Pradesh

Lucknow Development Authority V/S Manbhawan Singh

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Rajesh Kumar Tripathi, Sarita Tripathi

Respondant Advocate S.N.Tiwari

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/184/2020( Date of Filing : 27 Feb 2020 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/11/2019 in Case No. C/638/2009 of District Lucknow-II)1. Manbhawan SinghS/O ...

Case Number: 184

|

Date of Filing: 27-02-2020

|

Date of Upload: 12-09-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Lucknow Development Authority V/S Vikramaditya

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Nishant Verma

Respondant Advocate Ninnie Srivastava

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/259/2016( Date of Filing : 10 Feb 2016 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 13/05/2013 in Case No. C/732/2004 of District Lucknow-II)1. L. D. A.Lucknow.......

Case Number: 2013

|

Date of Filing: 29-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 29-08-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Smt. Nighat Rashid V/S Lucknow Development Authority

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate N. Shrivastava

Respondant Advocate S.M. Alam & V.V. Tripathi

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/495/2019( Date of Filing : 11 Apr 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/08/2018 in Case No. C/2012/1179 of District Lucknow-II)1. Lucknow Developmen...

Case Number: 495

|

Date of Filing: 11-04-2019

|

Date of Upload: 29-08-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Lucknow Development Authority V/S Rakesh Kumar Srivastava

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Dr. Shesh Narain Pandey

Respondant Advocate Dilip Kumar Shukla

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/95/2019( Date of Filing : 03 Apr 2019 )1. Rakesh Kumar SrivastavaS/O Late Satya Prakash Srivastava Resident Of 1/875 Sector 1 Gomti Nagar Exten...

Case Number: 95

|

Date of Filing: 03-04-2019

|

Date of Upload: 24-08-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Pawan Kumar Tiwari V/S Lucknow Development Authority

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Anshuman Sharma, Dilip Kumar Shukla

Respondant Advocate Anil Kumar Mishra

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/1300/2019( Date of Filing : 08 Nov 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/04/2018 in Case No. CC/1099/2013 of District Lucknow-II)1. Lucknow Developm...

Case Number: 1300

|

Date of Filing: 08-11-2019

|

Date of Upload: 16-08-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Smt. Geeta Singh Negi V/S Lucknow Development Authority

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S.N. Tewari

Respondant Advocate Harendra Kumar Srivastava, Malesh Kumar Pandey

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/573/2019( Date of Filing : 03 May 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 02/03/2019 in Case No. C/254/2011 of District Lucknow-I)1. Lucknow Development ...

Case Number: 573

|

Date of Filing: 03-05-2019

|

Date of Upload: 18-08-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Tirath Raj Singh V/S Lucknow Development Authority

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S.N. Tewari

Respondant Advocate Rajeev Kumar Srivastava & Mujeeb Effendi & Satish Chandra Srivastav

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Revision Petition No. RP/28/2019( Date of Filing : 23 Apr 2019 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 12/07/2016 in Case No. C/513/2016 of District Lucknow-II)1. Lucknow Develo...

Case Number: 28

|

Date of Filing: 23-04-2019

|

Date of Upload: 30-06-2022

NCDRC

RAGHVENDRA PRASAD V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY & MR. AMIT SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 169 OF 2017(Against the Order dated 06/10/2016 in Appeal No. 198/2016 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY6 JAGDISH CHANDAR BOSE MARG, NOW HAVING ITS OFFICE AT VIPIN K...

Case Number: 169

|

Date of Filing: 18-01-2017

|

Date of Upload: 26-04-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Lucknow Development Authority V/S Indrawati

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate -

Respondant Advocate Yogesh Tiwari

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2006/818( Date of Filing : 03 Apr 2006 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. IndrawatiMumbai...........Appellant...

Case Number: 2006

|

Date of Filing: 03-04-2006

|

Date of Upload: 02-03-2022

Uttar Pradesh

Lucknow Development Authority V/S A K Dubey

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mujeeb Efendi & M.H. Khan

Respondant Advocate S.N. Tiwari

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2000/1786( Date of Filing : 25 Jul 2000 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/06/2000 in Case No. C/1378/1999 of District Lucknow-II)1. A K Dubeya..........

Case Number: 2000

|

Date of Filing: 25-07-2000

|

Date of Upload: 04-01-2022

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Lucknow Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Lucknow Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Lucknow Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.