company-name-logo

Lucknow Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 120 Consumer Court Cases Against Lucknow Development Authority.

NCDRC

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SUSHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SUKUMAR PATTJOSHI

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 736 OF 2008(Against the Order dated 26/09/2007 in Appeal No. 1639/1997 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. SUSHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA83 -OF KYDGANJ ALLAHABAD ALLAHABAD...........Petitioner(s)Versus...

Case Number: 736

|

Date of Filing: 12-02-2008

|

Date of Upload: 09-07-2012

NCDRC

SALEEM AHMED V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 337 OF 2012 IN RP/211/20121. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. SALEEM AHMED...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:&nbspHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR....

Case Number: 337

|

Date of Filing: 17-05-2012

|

Date of Upload: 13-06-2012

NCDRC

RAM KUMAR GUPTA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2987 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 23/04/2009 in Appeal No. 1465/2005 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough Its Secretary . 6, Jagdish Chand Bose. Marg. Luckno...

Case Number: 2987

|

Date of Filing: 11-08-2009

|

Date of Upload: 07-09-2011

NCDRC

PREMLATA GAUTAM V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL SYED

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2096 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 23/03/2010 in Appeal No. 15/2006 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Secretary, Pradhikaran Bhawan, Vipin KhandLucknow...

Case Number: 2096

|

Date of Filing: 26-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 24-03-2011

NCDRC

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SHASHI BHUSHAN SINHA

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANJEEV BAHADUR SRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1488 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 03/12/2008 in Appeal No. 959/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. SHASHI BHUSHAN SINHAS/o. Late Raja Ram Sinha R/o. 44, Rajendra Nagar Lucknow U.P ..........

Case Number: 1488

|

Date of Filing: 23-04-2009

|

Date of Upload: 03-06-2010

NCDRC

ADITYA BHARGAVA V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED

Respondant Advocate

Date of Filing: 11 Jan 2010 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/346/2010(Against the Order dated 30/11/2009 in Appeal No. 13/2001 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough Its Secretary, 6, Jagd...

Case Number: 346

|

Date of Filing: 11-01-2010

|

Date of Upload: 10-02-2010

NCDRC

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SH.S.K.KATARIYA

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANDEEP SHARMA

Respondant Advocate NA

Date of Filing: 22 Mar 2005 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIAPPEAL NO. No. FA/106/2005(Against the Order dated 28/01/2005 in Complaint No. 150/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. SH.S.K.KATARIYARESIDENT OF HD-1/284, SECTOR-1 JANKIPURAN LUCKNOW ...

Case Number: 106

|

Date of Filing: 22-03-2005

|

Date of Upload: 18-11-2009

NCDRC

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S SH.O.P.SHARMA

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANDEEP SHARMA

Respondant Advocate NA

Date of Filing: 22 Mar 2005 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIAPPEAL NO. No. FA/107/2005(Against the Order dated 28/01/2005 in Complaint No. 1516/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. SH.O.P.SHARMARESIDENT OF H-1/283, SECTOR 1, JANKI PURAM LUCKNOW U...

Case Number: 107

|

Date of Filing: 22-03-2005

|

Date of Upload: 18-11-2009

NCDRC

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S MAN MOHAN AGARWAL

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. SANDEEP SHARMA

Respondant Advocate NA

Date of Filing: 22 Mar 2005 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIAPPEAL NO. No. FA/108/2005(Against the Order dated 28/01/2005 in Complaint No. 150/1999 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. MAN MOHAN AGARWALRESIDENT OF HD-1/52, SECTOR-I JANKI PURAM LUCKNOW...

Case Number: 108

|

Date of Filing: 22-03-2005

|

Date of Upload: 18-11-2009

NCDRC

AMAR SINHA & ANR. V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate SHAKIL AHMAD SYED

Respondant Advocate -

Date of Filing: 25 Aug 2005 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/2283/2005(Against the Order dated 14/07/2005 in Appeal No. 3026/SC/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYLUCKNOW - - ...........A...

Case Number: 2283

|

Date of Filing: 25-08-2005

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Lucknow Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Lucknow Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Lucknow Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.