Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMED SYED
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1905 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 19/08/2011 in Appeal No. 888/2009 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYThrough its Secretary, 6Jagdish Chand Bose Marg,LucknowU.P.....
Case Number: 1905
|
Date of Filing: 10-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-11-2012
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 742 OF 2012 IN RP/1768/20121. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. BHAGWAN DIN...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'...
Case Number: 742
|
Date of Filing: 08-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 05-11-2012
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VINAY GARG
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 743 OF 2012 IN RP/1769/20121. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY...........Appellants(s)Versus1. SARVESH CHANDRA CHATURVEDI...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESI...
Case Number: 743
|
Date of Filing: 08-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 05-11-2012
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. PARMANAND SHARMA
Respondant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMED SYED
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2475 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 17/10/2006 in Appeal No. 127/1998 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. O.P. DWIVEDI AND ORSS/O SHRI R.S. DWIVEDI, RESIDENT OF 3/125, VISHESH KAHAND GOMTI NAGER ...
Case Number: 2475
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2007
|
Date of Upload: 27-09-2012
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED
Respondant Advocate MR. PRAVEEN AGRAWAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3728 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 08/10/2007 in Appeal No. 1922/SC/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOMTI NAGAR, LUCKNOW ( U. ...
Case Number: 3728
|
Date of Filing: 12-11-2007
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2012
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED
Respondant Advocate MR. PRAVEEN AGRAWAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3744 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 08/10/2007 in Appeal No. 1923/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOMTI NAGAR, LUCKNOW, ( U. P. ...
Case Number: 3744
|
Date of Filing: 13-11-2007
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2012
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED
Respondant Advocate MR. PRAVEEN AGRAWAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3744 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 08/10/2007 in Appeal No. 1923/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOMTI NAGAR, LUCKNOW, ( U. P. ...
Case Number: 3745
|
Date of Filing: 13-11-2007
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2012
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED
Respondant Advocate MR. PRAVEEN AGRWAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3744 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 08/10/2007 in Appeal No. 1923/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOMTI NAGAR, LUCKNOW, ( U. P. ...
Case Number: 3746
|
Date of Filing: 13-11-2007
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2012
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED
Respondant Advocate MR. PRAVEEN AGRAWAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3744 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 08/10/2007 in Appeal No. 1923/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOMTI NAGAR, LUCKNOW, ( U. P. ...
Case Number: 3747
|
Date of Filing: 13-11-2007
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2012
Development Authority Lucknow Development Authority
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SHAKIL AHMAD SYED
Respondant Advocate MR. PRAVEEN AGRAWAL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3744 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 08/10/2007 in Appeal No. 1923/2003 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, GOMTI NAGAR, LUCKNOW, ( U. P. ...
Case Number: 3748
|
Date of Filing: 13-11-2007
|
Date of Upload: 31-08-2012
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Lucknow Development Authority in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Lucknow Development Authority ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Lucknow Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.