company-name-logo

Lucknow Development Authority

Latest Judgments

Total 120 Consumer Court Cases Against Lucknow Development Authority.

NCDRC

ALOK SRIVASTAVA V/S VICE CHAIRMAN, LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS.

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. ANANT PRAKASH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 618 OF 2021(Against the Order dated 28/12/2020 in Complaint No. 165/2000 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. VICE CHAIRMAN, LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS............Appellant(s)Versus1. ALOK S...

Case Number: 654

|

Date of Filing: 29-09-2021

|

Date of Upload: 02-08-2024

NCDRC

ALOK SRIVASTAVA V/S VICE CHAIRMAN, LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS.

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. ANANT PRAKASH

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 618 OF 2021(Against the Order dated 28/12/2020 in Complaint No. 165/2000 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh) 1. VICE CHAIRMAN, LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 2 ORS............Appellant(s)Versus1. ALOK S...

Case Number: 618

|

Date of Filing: 21-09-2021

|

Date of Upload: 02-08-2024

Uttar Pradesh

Lucknow Development Authority V/S Chand Babu

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Self

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Miscellaneous Application No. MA/49/2024( Date of Filing : 21 Feb 2024 )InEA/01/20241. Chand Babuaa...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Lucknow Development Authorityaaa.....

Case Number: 49

|

Date of Filing: 21-02-2024

|

Date of Upload: 02-05-2024

NCDRC

RIDDHI TANDON V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MUKESH VERMA PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 155 OF 2024 IN RP/1897/20231. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY6 JAGDISH CHANDRA BOSE MARG LUCKNOWLUCKNOWUTTAR PRADESH...........Appellants(s)Versus1. RIDDHI TANDONA 757 INDIRA MARGLUCKNOWLUCKNOWU...

Case Number: 155

|

Date of Filing: 29-02-2024

|

Date of Upload: 26-03-2024

NCDRC

PREM KISHOR SINGH & ANR. V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. ANANT AGARWAL,SWETA RANI, SAMARTH AGARWAL & RITIKA KHANNA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2808 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 04/04/2016 in Appeal No. 2129/2008 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY, 6, JAGDISH CHAND BOSE MARG,LUCKNOWUT...

Case Number: 2808

|

Date of Filing: 26-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 17-01-2024

NCDRC

OM PRAKASH SRIVASTAVA V/S THE SECRETARY, LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate RAJESH K. SINGH

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2779 OF 2023(Against the Order dated 08/08/2023 in Appeal No. A/234/2022 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. THE SECRETARY, LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYPRADHIKARAN BHAWAAN, VIPIN KHAND, GOMTI NAG...

Case Number: 2779

|

Date of Filing: 29-11-2023

|

Date of Upload: 15-12-2023

NCDRC

AMAR JYOTI BHARDWAJ & ANR. V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate MR. ASHOK SHUKLA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 708 OF 2020(Against the Order dated 28/09/2018 in Complaint No. 366/2016 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.THROUGH EXTATE OFFICER, NAVEEN BHAWAN, VIPIN KHAND, GOMT...

Case Number: 708

|

Date of Filing: 06-10-2020

|

Date of Upload: 09-10-2023

NCDRC

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY V/S JAGANNATHI DEVI (DEAD) THRU LAKHAN LAL GUPTA

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RABIN MAJUMDER & MS. AKANSHA SRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate M/S. U N MISHRA & ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 863 OF 2021(Against the Order dated 01/09/2021 in Complaint No. 131/2000 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. JAGANNATHI DEVI (DEAD) THRU LAKHAN LAL GUPTA THROUGH SRI LAKHAN LAL GUPTA, R/O FLAT NO. 103,...

Case Number: 863

|

Date of Filing: 30-11-2021

|

Date of Upload: 05-09-2023

Uttar Pradesh

Lucknow Development Authority V/S Durga Pratap Singh

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Amod Rathore

Respondant Advocate Yogesh Tiwari, Anu Tiwari, Piyush Pathak, Shreesh Kumar, Dilip Kumar Shukla, R.K. Gupta

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. CC/20/2023( Date of Filing : 20 Feb 2023 )1. Durga Pratap SinghS/o Late Sri Arjun Singh R/o A-1/108D Vinit Khand Gomti Nagar Lucknow...........Com...

Case Number: 20

|

Date of Filing: 20-02-2023

|

Date of Upload: 23-06-2023

NCDRC

MAHESH RAM V/S LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Development Authority   Lucknow Development Authority  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. YASHARTH KANT, MR. VIKAS SRIVASTAVA & MS. ANAMIKA YADAV

Respondant Advocate ,R. ISAR HUSAIN

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1004 OF 2022(Against the Order dated 01/11/2022 in Complaint No. 71/2019 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYTHROUGH ITS SECRETARY VIPIN KHAND, GOMTI NAGAR LUCKNOW, U.P.......

Case Number: 1004

|

Date of Filing: 23-12-2022

|

Date of Upload: 30-06-2023

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Lucknow Development Authority in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Lucknow Development Authority ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Lucknow Development Authority under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.