Lloyd
Latest Judgments
Total 144 Consumer Court Cases Against Lloyd.
The General Manager LLoyd Electrical and Engineering Limited V/S K. Ramesh Babu
Court Name: West Godavari
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 35
|
Date of Filing: 03-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 28-10-2017
LLOYD Electronics V/S Arun Kumar
Court Name: Fatehabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/260/20161. Arun KumarS/O Sanjay KumarC/O Fames Hair Style M.C Colony FatehabadFatehabadHaryana...........Complainant(s)Versus1. LLOYD ElectronicsPlot No. 2 Industrial Area Kalkaji New DelhiDelhiDelhi............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR....
Case Number: 260
|
Date of Filing: 04-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-08-2017
1. Authorised Signatory Office Manager. Depot Supervlsor M/s. M.R.F. Limited V/S Mr. Lloyd Pinto
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 279
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 16-08-2017
Lloyd Electric & Engineering Ltd V/S Manjit Kaur
Court Name: Ludhiana
Appelant Advocate Upkar Singh Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTESREDRESSAL FORUM, LUDHIANA. Consumer Complaint No. : 532 of 22.07.2016 Date of Decision : 24.07.2017Manjit Kaur Bedi aged 62 years wife of S.Tarlok Singh Bedi, resident of 48, 2nd Floor, Sant Ishar Singh Nagar, Ludhiana.….. ComplainantVersus1.Lloyd...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2017
Managing Director, Lloyd Electric & Engineering Ltd., V/S Dr. Sheenu Aggarwal
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Suresh Goyal Adv. & Pradeep Sharma Adv.
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, U.T. CHANDIGARH======Consumer Complaint No:762 of 2016Date of Institution:12.09.2016Date of Decision:14.07.2017Dr.Sheenu Aggarwal W/o Sh.Sushil Aggarwal, resident of House No.1221, Sector 42-B, Chandigarh. …..ComplainantVersu...
Case Number: 762
|
Date of Filing: 12-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2017
The Lloyd Electric & Engineering Ltd V/S Sunita W/o Pawan Kumar
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate Sh. Kavinder Singh
Respondant Advocate Mohit Sachdeva
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.270 of 2014 Date of instt.:24.09.2014 Date of decision:29.5.2017Mrs. Sunita wife of Shri Pawan Kumar, New Grain Market, Gharaunda District Karnal. ……..Complainant. Vs.1. The Lloyd Electri...
Case Number: 270
|
Date of Filing: 26-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2017
KAMAL KISHORE MITTAL & ANR. V/S LLOYD ELECTRIC & ENGINEERING LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. LAKSHAY DHAMIJA & MR. SAHIL GUPTA
Respondant Advocate MR. H.D THANVI & MR. BALKISHAN LADHANIA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1586 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 21/03/2016 in Appeal No. 195/2016 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. LLOYD ELECTRIC & ENGINEERING LTD.THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN/MANAGING DIRECTOR, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT...
Case Number: 1586
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-05-2017
NEW INDIA ASSUARANCE COMPANY LTD. V/S FEDDERS LLOYD CORPORATION LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NAVEEN CHAWLA
Respondant Advocate MR. KISHORE RAWAT
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 142 OF 20031. FEDDERS LLOYD CORPORATION LTD.C-4 ,PHASE - II, NOIDA, GHAZIABAD, U.P. - 201 305...........Complainant(s)Versus1. NEW INDIA ASSUARANCE COMPANY LTD.NEW INDIA ASSURANCE BUILDING ,87, M.G. ROAD F...
Case Number: 142
|
Date of Filing: 23-05-2003
|
Date of Upload: 30-03-2017
Lloyd Service Centre V/S Anish Raj
Court Name: Kottayam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, KottayamKottayamComplaint Case No. CC/346/20161. Anish RajMarottickal House Edakkoly Chakkampuzha P OKottayamKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Lloyd Service CentreASH ASP Kottayam Jiss Engineers Near Malayala ManoramaKottayamKerala2. Lloyd...
Case Number: 346
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-04-2017
LLOYD ELECTRIC V/S AMIT JOHARI
Court Name: Ghaziabad
Appelant Advocate AJAY PRATAP SINGH
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 223
|
Date of Filing: 19-06-2015
|
Date of Upload: 08-02-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Lloyd in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Lloyd ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Lloyd under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.