Laboratory
Latest Judgments
Total 118 Consumer Court Cases Against Laboratory.
Rajana Laboratory Mannuthy V/S Satheesh Kumar
Court Name: Trissur
Appelant Advocate M.R. Arun
Respondant Advocate A.D. Benny
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMAYYANTHOLETHRISSUR-3Complaint Case No. CC/05/12291. Satheesh KumarS/o. Kankissery Veettil Parameswaran, Vellanikkara, Thrissur............Complainant(s)Versus1. Rajana Laboratory MannuthyRep. by Proprietor Stanly Benjamin............Opp.Party(s) B...
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2005
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd V/S Ridhi Laboratory
Court Name: Kachchh
Appelant Advocate R.M.Thacker
Respondant Advocate R.J.Dholakiya
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-08-2020
Vector Biotek Pvt.Ltd. V/S Goyal Clinical Laboratory
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate N.P.Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/12/491. Goyal Clinical Laboratorythroughi ts Prop/Dr.Ashok Kumar Goyal,I-c,veer colony Near Urang cinema,Amrik Singh road,Bathinda..............
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 08-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
The Proprietor, Biswas Diagnostices and Polyclinic Computerized Laboratory V/S SRI SAMARENDRA SWAR
Court Name: Burdwan
Appelant Advocate Subrata Nayak
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Shivam Laboratory & Other, V/S Sri Babul Biswas & Other,
Court Name: Cooch Behar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 50
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2018
M/S. BHARAT PATHOLOGICAL LABORATORY V/S 1.M/S. TRANSASIA BIO-MEDICALS LTD
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SRINIVASA KARRA
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/501/2010(Arisen out of Order Dated 25/02/2010 in Case No. 501/2010 of District Anantapur)1. 1.M/S. TRANSASIA BIO-MEDICALS LTD8, CHANDIVALI STUDIO ROAD, ANDHERI, MUMBAIMUMBAI...........Appellant(s)Versus1. M/S. BHARAT PATHOLOGICAL LABORATORY5-7-623, KHALLELWADI...
Case Number: 501
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SUPRATECH MICROPATH LABORATORY AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE V/S PRAFULBHAI R SHETH
Court Name: Ahmedabad City
Appelant Advocate D P KINARIWALA
Respondant Advocate Y T MEHTA
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2019
Anand Diagnostic Laboratory V/S Ranjini Sethuraman,C/o & D/o Gopalakrishna
Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional
Appelant Advocate IP
Respondant Advocate Arvind Moorchung
Complaint Case No. CC/2242/20101. Ranjini Sethuraman,C/o & D/o Gopalakrishna #49,2nd main road,Kalyana nagar,Nagarabhavi main road,Blore-72 BEFORE: PRESENT: ORDERDate of Filing : 29.09.2010Date of Order : 16.06.2011BEFORE THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL F...
Case Number: 2242
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Shivam Laboratory V/S Sri. Jyotirmoy Roy
Court Name: Cooch Behar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum,B. S. Road, Cooch Behar -736101.Ph. No.230696, 222023E-mail - confo-kb-wb at the rate of nic.inWeb - confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/11/10( Date of Filing : 21 Mar 2011 )1. Sri. Jyotirmoy Roy S/O Lt.Aswini Kumar Roy,Vill.Chaat Guria...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 21-08-2018
Sh. Subhash Chandra Prop. M/s Santokh Diagnostic Laboratory V/S Reliance Communication Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. D.K. Singal, Adv. for appellant
Respondant Advocate None for respondent No. 1, Sh. Sandeep Suri, Adv. for respondent no. 2
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 409 of 2010 1. Reliance Communication Ltd.SCO 135-136, Sector 9-C, Chandigarh and Having its Circle office at, Tower-F, Ground Fl...
Case Number: 409
|
Date of Filing: 08-11-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Laboratory in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Laboratory ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Laboratory under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.